Radeon PRO W7700 vs R7 M380

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 M380 with Radeon PRO W7700, including specs and performance data.

R7 M380
2015
4 GB DDR3
4.32

PRO W7700 outperforms R7 M380 by a whopping 1100% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking63845
Place by popularity94not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data24.78
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)RDNA 3.0 (2022)
GPU code nameTropoNavi 32
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date7 May 2015 (9 years ago)13 November 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999
Current priceno data$999 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6403072
Compute units10no data
Core clock speed915 MHzno data
Boost clock speed915 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data190 Watt
Texture fill rate36.60499.2
Floating-point performance1,171 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R7 M380 and Radeon PRO W7700 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 2.1
Eyefinity1no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D+no data
PowerTune+no data
DualGraphics1no data
TrueAudio-no data
ZeroCore+no data
Switchable graphics1no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed2.2
Vulkanno data1.3
Mantle+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 M380 4.32
PRO W7700 51.83
+1100%

PRO W7700 outperforms R7 M380 by 1100% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R7 M380 1668
PRO W7700 20016
+1100%

PRO W7700 outperforms R7 M380 by 1100% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−1011%
100−105
+1011%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−1000%
110−120
+1000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−1000%
110−120
+1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−1011%
100−105
+1011%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−1067%
140−150
+1067%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−1050%
230−240
+1050%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1088%
95−100
+1088%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−1074%
270−280
+1074%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−1082%
130−140
+1082%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−1088%
190−200
+1088%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
−1050%
230−240
+1050%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−1011%
100−105
+1011%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−1000%
110−120
+1000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−1000%
110−120
+1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−1011%
100−105
+1011%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−1067%
140−150
+1067%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−1050%
230−240
+1050%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1088%
95−100
+1088%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−1074%
270−280
+1074%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−1082%
130−140
+1082%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−1088%
190−200
+1088%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−1000%
110−120
+1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
−1050%
230−240
+1050%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−1011%
100−105
+1011%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−1000%
110−120
+1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−1011%
100−105
+1011%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−1050%
230−240
+1050%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−1074%
270−280
+1074%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−1088%
190−200
+1088%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−1000%
110−120
+1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
−1050%
230−240
+1050%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−1082%
130−140
+1082%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−1088%
95−100
+1088%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%
Hitman 3 9−10
−1011%
100−105
+1011%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−1000%
110−120
+1000%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−1088%
95−100
+1088%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Hitman 3 0−1 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.32 51.83
Recency 7 May 2015 13 November 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

The Radeon PRO W7700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M380 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M380 is a notebook card while Radeon PRO W7700 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M380
Radeon R7 M380
AMD Radeon PRO W7700
Radeon PRO W7700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 3 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.