Radeon RX 6650M vs R7 M370

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 M370 and Radeon RX 6650M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R7 M370
2015
4 GB GDDR5
3.38

RX 6650M outperforms R7 M370 by a whopping 966% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking763147
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.87
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameLithoNavi 23
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 May 2015 (10 years ago)4 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841792
Core clock speed900 MHz2068 MHz
Boost clock speed960 MHz2416 MHz
Number of transistors690 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data120 Watt
Texture fill rate23.04270.6
Floating-point processing power0.7373 TFLOPS8.659 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs24112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth73.6 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed2.1
Vulkan-1.3
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R7 M370 3.38
RX 6650M 36.02
+966%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 M370 Samples: 15 1417
RX 6650M Samples: 109 15091
+965%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R7 M370 2524
RX 6650M 32846
+1201%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R7 M370 1760
RX 6650M 25739
+1362%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14
−721%
115
+721%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−1454%
200−210
+1454%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−1714%
127
+1714%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−833%
80−85
+833%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−877%
120−130
+877%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−1454%
200−210
+1454%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−1414%
106
+1414%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−1070%
110−120
+1070%
Fortnite 18−20
−184%
54
+184%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−729%
140−150
+729%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−1167%
110−120
+1167%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−833%
80−85
+833%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−867%
140−150
+867%
Valorant 50−55
−332%
210−220
+332%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−877%
120−130
+877%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−1454%
200−210
+1454%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
−341%
270−280
+341%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−1029%
79
+1029%
Dota 2 30−35
−269%
118
+269%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−1070%
110−120
+1070%
Fortnite 18−20
−142%
46
+142%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−729%
140−150
+729%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−1167%
110−120
+1167%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−11
−1120%
120−130
+1120%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−833%
80−85
+833%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−1333%
86
+1333%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−867%
140−150
+867%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
−1570%
167
+1570%
Valorant 50−55
−332%
210−220
+332%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−877%
120−130
+877%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−814%
64
+814%
Dota 2 30−35
−213%
100
+213%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−1070%
110−120
+1070%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−729%
140−150
+729%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−833%
80−85
+833%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−867%
140−150
+867%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
−1400%
90
+1400%
Valorant 50−55
−332%
210−220
+332%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
−111%
40
+111%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−1171%
85−90
+1171%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
−873%
250−260
+873%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−2333%
70−75
+2333%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−2550%
50−55
+2550%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−503%
170−180
+503%
Valorant 30−35
−632%
240−250
+632%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1950%
40−45
+1950%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1350%
85−90
+1350%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−1175%
100−110
+1175%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
−1300%
40−45
+1300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1240%
65−70
+1240%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 6−7
−1483%
95−100
+1483%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−381%
75−80
+381%
Valorant 16−18
−1206%
220−230
+1206%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1800%
18−20
+1800%
Dota 2 10−12
−864%
100−110
+864%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2250%
45−50
+2250%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1600%
65−70
+1600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−1075%
45−50
+1075%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−1050%
45−50
+1050%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

This is how R7 M370 and RX 6650M compete in popular games:

  • RX 6650M is 721% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6650M is 2550% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6650M performs better in 58 tests (88%)
  • there's a draw in 8 tests (12%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.38 36.02
Recency 5 May 2015 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm

RX 6650M has a 965.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6650M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M370 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M370
Radeon R7 M370
AMD Radeon RX 6650M
Radeon RX 6650M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 87 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 145 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 M370 or Radeon RX 6650M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.