Radeon 740M vs R7 M370

Place in the ranking	716	508
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	37.95
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Litho	Phoenix
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	5 May 2015 (9 years ago)	4 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	256
Core clock speed	900 MHz	800 MHz
Boost clock speed	960 MHz	2500 MHz
Number of transistors	690 million	25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	23.04	40.00
Floating-point processing power	0.7373 TFLOPS	2.56 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	24	16
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	73.6 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	Portable Device Dependent
Eyefinity	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	+	-
HD3D	+	-
PowerTune	+	-
DualGraphics	+	-
ZeroCore	+	-
Switchable graphics	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	Not Listed	2.1
Vulkan	-	1.3
Mantle	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 M370 3.69

Radeon 740M 8.27
+124%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 M370 1417

Radeon 740M 3181
+124%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R7 M370 2524

Radeon 740M 7490
+197%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R7 M370 1760

Radeon 740M 5135
+192%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−50%

21
+50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −45.5%	16−18 +45.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −100%	16−18 +100%
Elden Ring	8−9 −188%	21−24 +188%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 −170%	27−30 +170%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −45.5%	16−18 +45.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −100%	16−18 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −194%	47 +194%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −175%	21−24 +175%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −91.7%	21−24 +91.7%
Valorant	5−6 −480%	27−30 +480%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 −170%	27−30 +170%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −18.2%	13 +18.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −100%	16−18 +100%
Dota 2	10−12 −191%	32 +191%
Elden Ring	8−9 −188%	21−24 +188%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −10.5%	21 +10.5%
Fortnite	21−24 −133%	45−50 +133%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −131%	37 +131%
Grand Theft Auto V	10−12 −164%	27−30 +164%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −175%	21−24 +175%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 −100%	65−70 +100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −91.7%	21−24 +91.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10 −150%	24−27 +150%
Valorant	5−6 −480%	27−30 +480%
World of Tanks	60−65 −96.8%	120−130 +96.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 −170%	27−30 +170%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −45.5%	16−18 +45.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −100%	16−18 +100%
Dota 2	10−12 −118%	24−27 +118%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −84.2%	35−40 +84.2%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −87.5%	30 +87.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 −100%	65−70 +100%
Valorant	5−6 −480%	27−30 +480%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%
Elden Ring	4−5 −175%	10−12 +175%
Grand Theft Auto V	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24−27 −57.7%	40−45 +57.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
World of Tanks	24−27 −131%	60−65 +131%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −275%	14−16 +275%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −113%	16−18 +113%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −467%	16−18 +467%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
Valorant	10−12 −90.9%	21−24 +90.9%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −18.8%	18−20 +18.8%
Elden Ring	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−11 −140%	24−27 +140%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −133%	7−8 +133%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Dota 2	16−18 −119%	35−40 +119%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Fortnite	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
Valorant	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%