GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs Radeon R7 M365X

Place in performance ranking	845	257
Place by popularity	not in top-100	80
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	18.35
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Litho	N18P-G62
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	5 May 2015 (9 years ago)	2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Current price	no data	$892

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	1024
Compute units	6	no data
Core clock speed	900 MHz	1350 MHz
Boost clock speed	825 MHz	1485 MHz
Number of transistors	690 million	6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	50 Watt (50 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	23.04	95.04
Floating-point performance	737.3 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R7 M365X and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Eyefinity	1	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	-	no data
Enduro	-	no data
FreeSync	1	no data
HD3D	+	no data
PowerTune	+	no data
DualGraphics	1	no data
TrueAudio	-	no data
ZeroCore	+	no data
Switchable graphics	1	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	Not Listed	1.2
Vulkan	no data	1.2.140
Mantle	+	no data
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 M365X 2.00

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.19
+910%

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon R7 M365X by 910% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R7 M365X 774

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796
+907%

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon R7 M365X by 907% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	5−6 −1060%	58 +1060%
1440p	4−5 −1075%	47 +1075%
4K	2−3 −1050%	23 +1050%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6

−1080%

59
+1080%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −917%	61 +917%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −1125%	49 +1125%
Battlefield 5	6−7 −1000%	65−70 +1000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −960%	53 +960%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −1050%	46 +1050%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −1050%	69 +1050%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −950%	84 +950%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −911%	90−95 +911%
Hitman 3	5−6 −920%	51 +920%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −1050%	115 +1050%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −911%	91 +911%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −1000%	44 +1000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −956%	95 +956%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −1100%	60 +1100%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −1050%	46 +1050%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −967%	32 +967%
Battlefield 5	6−7 −1000%	65−70 +1000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −1075%	47 +1075%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1100%	36 +1100%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −1060%	58 +1060%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −1080%	59 +1080%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −911%	90−95 +911%
Hitman 3	4−5 −1025%	45 +1025%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −1025%	180 +1025%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −1033%	68 +1033%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −950%	42 +950%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −971%	75 +971%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −929%	72 +929%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −917%	183 +917%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −1250%	27 +1250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −1400%	15 +1400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −933%	31 +933%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1033%	34 +1033%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −1200%	39 +1200%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −911%	90−95 +911%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 −967%	64 +967%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −950%	63 +950%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −1200%	39 +1200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −1000%	22 +1000%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−925%

41
+925%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −1200%	35−40 +1200%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −1233%	40−45 +1233%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −1800%	18−20 +1800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1200%	24−27 +1200%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1500%	16 +1500%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −1033%	30−35 +1033%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −1200%	35−40 +1200%
Hitman 3	2−3 −1300%	28 +1300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −925%	40−45 +925%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −1167%	35−40 +1167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −950%	40−45 +950%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −1050%	21−24 +1050%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−1000%

30−35
+1000%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −1900%	20−22 +1900%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −1900%	20 +1900%
Hitman 3	1−2 −1500%	16 +1500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −1000%	21−24 +1000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1−2 −1700%	18 +1700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −1150%	25 +1150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	10−11
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	6
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1100%	12 +1100%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −1300%	27−30 +1300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −1000%	21−24 +1000%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −1800%	18−20 +1800%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	8−9