GeForce 8800 GTS 512 vs Radeon R7 M365X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 M365X with GeForce 8800 GTS 512, including specs and performance data.

R7 M365X
2015
4 GB GDDR5
1.97
+50.4%

R7 M365X outperforms 8800 GTS 512 by an impressive 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9321061
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.04
Power efficiencyno data0.75
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameLithoG92
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 May 2015 (10 years ago)11 December 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384128
Compute units6no data
Core clock speed900 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speed825 MHzno data
Number of transistors690 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data135 Watt
Texture fill rate23.0441.60
Floating-point processing power0.7373 TFLOPS0.416 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2464
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KB64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data254 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz820 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s52.48 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1211.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCLNot Listed1.1
Vulkan-N/A
Mantle+-
CUDA-1.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R7 M365X 1.97
+50.4%
8800 GTS 512 1.31

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 M365X 824
+50.1%
Samples: 36
8800 GTS 512 549
Samples: 423

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.97 1.31
Recency 5 May 2015 11 December 2007
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm

R7 M365X has a 50.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R7 M365X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800 GTS 512 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M365X is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 8800 GTS 512 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M365X
Radeon R7 M365X
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
GeForce 8800 GTS 512

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 55 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M365X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 137 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS 512 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 M365X or GeForce 8800 GTS 512, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.