Radeon RX 6300M vs R7 M360

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 M360 and Radeon RX 6300M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R7 M360
2015
4 GB DDR3
1.41

6300M outperforms R7 M360 by a whopping 989% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1042381
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data33.77
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameMesoNavi 24
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 May 2015 (10 years ago)4 January 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384768
Compute units6no data
Core clock speed1100 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed1125 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt
Texture fill rate27.00115.2
Floating-point processing power0.864 TFLOPS3.686 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2448
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L0 Cacheno data192 KB
L1 Cache96 KB256 KB
L2 Cache128 KB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit32 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s72 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.06.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed2.2
Vulkan+1.3
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R7 M360 1.41
RX 6300M 15.35
+989%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 M360 588
Samples: 357
RX 6300M 6421
+992%
Samples: 5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12
−983%
130−140
+983%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1000%
30−35
+1000%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 0−1 30−35

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 2−3
−3250%
65−70
+3250%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1000%
30−35
+1000%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1600%
50−55
+1600%
Fortnite 5−6
−1640%
85−90
+1640%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−713%
65−70
+713%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−2350%
45−50
+2350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−480%
55−60
+480%
Valorant 35−40
−263%
120−130
+263%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 2−3
−3250%
65−70
+3250%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 44
−366%
200−210
+366%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1000%
30−35
+1000%
Dota 2 18−20
−439%
95−100
+439%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1600%
50−55
+1600%
Fortnite 5−6
−1640%
85−90
+1640%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−713%
65−70
+713%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−2350%
45−50
+2350%
Grand Theft Auto V 5
−1080%
55−60
+1080%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1550%
30−35
+1550%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−480%
55−60
+480%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
−500%
40−45
+500%
Valorant 35−40
−263%
120−130
+263%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3
−3250%
65−70
+3250%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1000%
30−35
+1000%
Dota 2 18−20
−439%
95−100
+439%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1600%
50−55
+1600%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−713%
65−70
+713%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−480%
55−60
+480%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−500%
40−45
+500%
Valorant 35−40
−263%
120−130
+263%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
−1640%
85−90
+1640%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−11
−1050%
110−120
+1050%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−986%
150−160
+986%
Valorant 6−7
−2517%
150−160
+2517%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1600%
30−35
+1600%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−850%
35−40
+850%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−667%
21−24
+667%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−107%
27−30
+107%
Valorant 7−8
−1143%
85−90
+1143%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 2−3
−2700%
55−60
+2700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

This is how R7 M360 and RX 6300M compete in popular games:

  • RX 6300M is 983% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 6300M is 3250% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6300M performs better in 45 tests (76%)
  • there's a draw in 14 tests (24%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.41 15.35
Recency 5 May 2015 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm

R7 M360 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 6300M, on the other hand, has a 989% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 367% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6300M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M360 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 222 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 14 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 M360 or Radeon RX 6300M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.