Arc 7-Cores iGPU vs Radeon R7 M360

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 M360 and Arc 7-Cores iGPU, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R7 M360
2015
4 GB DDR3
1.50

Arc 7-Cores iGPU outperforms R7 M360 by a whopping 1050% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking982320
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameMesoMeteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 May 2015 (9 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3847
Compute units6no data
Core clock speed1100 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1125 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Texture fill rate27.00no data
Floating-point processing power0.864 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212_2
Shader Model6.0no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCLNot Listedno data
Vulkan+-
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 M360 1.50
Arc 7-Cores iGPU 17.25
+1050%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R7 M360 2029
Arc 7-Cores iGPU 11795
+481%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

R7 M360 5544
Arc 7-Cores iGPU 38592
+596%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R7 M360 1146
Arc 7-Cores iGPU 8449
+637%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

R7 M360 5746
Arc 7-Cores iGPU 45644
+694%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD11
−209%
34
+209%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−900%
90
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Elden Ring 1−2
−5300%
50−55
+5300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−2700%
55−60
+2700%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−544%
58
+544%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−689%
70−75
+689%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−486%
40−45
+486%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−2700%
55−60
+2700%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−244%
31
+244%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Dota 2 3
−2267%
71
+2267%
Elden Ring 1−2
−5300%
50−55
+5300%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−209%
34
+209%
Fortnite 7−8
−1243%
90−95
+1243%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−689%
70−75
+689%
Grand Theft Auto V 5
−360%
23
+360%
Metro Exodus 0−1 45−50
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−650%
120−130
+650%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−486%
40−45
+486%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
−420%
52
+420%
World of Tanks 44
−382%
210−220
+382%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−2700%
55−60
+2700%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−1011%
100−105
+1011%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Dota 2 2−3
−3200%
66
+3200%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−218%
35
+218%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−689%
70−75
+689%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−650%
120−130
+650%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring 0−1 27−30
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1011%
100−105
+1011%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 14−16
World of Tanks 9−10
−1011%
100−105
+1011%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−1011%
100−105
+1011%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−780%
40−45
+780%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−667%
21−24
+667%
Valorant 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−1025%
180−190
+1025%
Elden Ring 0−1 12−14
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−93.3%
27−30
+93.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 10−12
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−93.3%
27−30
+93.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−1600%
16−18
+1600%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Dota 2 16−18
−81.3%
27−30
+81.3%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2100%
21−24
+2100%
Valorant 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Elden Ring 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 38
+0%
38
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+0%
22
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

This is how R7 M360 and Arc 7-Cores iGPU compete in popular games:

  • Arc 7-Cores iGPU is 209% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Elden Ring, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the Arc 7-Cores iGPU is 5300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc 7-Cores iGPU is ahead in 30 tests (59%)
  • there's a draw in 21 test (41%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.50 17.25
Recency 5 May 2015 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

Arc 7-Cores iGPU has a 1050% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc 7-Cores iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M360 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M360
Radeon R7 M360
Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU
Arc 7-Cores iGPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 196 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 51 vote

Rate Arc 7-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.