GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R7 M350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
R5 M315 R7 A360 R7 M340 R7 M350 R7 M360 R7 M440 R7 M445 R7 M460 R8 M365DX R8 M445DX R8 M535DX
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
1630 1650 1650 GDDR6 1650 SUPER 1650 TU106 1650 TU116

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 M350 with GeForce GTX 1650, including specs and performance data.

R7 M350
2015
4 GB DDR3, 35 Watt
2.60

GTX 1650 outperforms R7 M350 by a whopping 628% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R7 M350 R7 M350
GTX 1650 GTX 1650

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking873329
Place by popularitynot in top-1003
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data23.70
Power efficiency5.7319.49
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameMesoTU117
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 May 2015 (11 years ago)23 April 2019 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384896
Compute units6no data
Core clock speed1000 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed825 MHz1665 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate24.3693.24
Floating-point processing power0.7795 TFLOPS2.984 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2456
L1 Cache96 KB896 KB
L2 Cache128 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Eyefinity+-
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
Mantle+-
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R7 M350 2.60
GTX 1650 18.93
+628%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 M350 1080
Samples: 43
GTX 1650 7868
+629%
Samples: 36900

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8−9
−663%
61
+663%
1440p5−6
−660%
38
+660%
4K3−4
−700%
24
+700%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.44
1440pno data3.92
4Kno data6.21

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 61
+0%
61
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 81
+0%
81
+0%
Far Cry 5 69
+0%
69
+0%
Fortnite 211
+0%
211
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90
+0%
90
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90
+0%
90
+0%
Valorant 292
+0%
292
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Dota 2 97
+0%
97
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 74
+0%
74
+0%
Far Cry 5 63
+0%
63
+0%
Fortnite 85
+0%
85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 83
+0%
83
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 81
+0%
81
+0%
Metro Exodus 35
+0%
35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 86
+0%
86
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
+0%
71
+0%
Valorant 260
+0%
260
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 51
+0%
51
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Dota 2 92
+0%
92
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 60
+0%
60
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65
+0%
65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 66
+0%
66
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 41
+0%
41
+0%
Valorant 70
+0%
70
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 61
+0%
61
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 40
+0%
40
+0%
Metro Exodus 20
+0%
20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 177
+0%
177
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 38
+0%
38
+0%
Far Cry 5 40
+0%
40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 46
+0%
46
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31
+0%
31
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 42
+0%
42
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 33
+0%
33
+0%
Metro Exodus 12
+0%
12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
+0%
26
+0%
Valorant 83
+0%
83
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 59
+0%
59
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 19
+0%
19
+0%
Far Cry 5 19
+0%
19
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30
+0%
30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 26
+0%
26
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 11
+0%
11
+0%

This is how R7 M350 and GTX 1650 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 is 663% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 is 660% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 is 700% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.60 18.93
Recency 5 May 2015 23 April 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 75 Watt

R7 M350 has 114% lower power consumption.

GTX 1650, on the other hand, has a 628% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 133% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1650 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M350 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M350 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 1650 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R7 M350 Radeon R7 M350
vs
GT 745M GeForce GT 745M
GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650
vs
GTX 780 GeForce GTX 780
R7 M350 Radeon R7 M350
vs
HD 8750M Radeon HD 8750M
GTX 560 GeForce GTX 560
vs
9800M GTS GeForce 9800M GTS
GTX 560 GeForce GTX 560
vs
T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile
GT 520 GeForce GT 520
vs
ATI Mobility HD 5450 Radeon HD 5450
GT 520 PCIe x1 GeForce GT 520 PCIe x1
vs
HD Graphics P4000 Graphics P4000
GTX 1060 6 GB 9Gbps GTX 1060 6 GB 9Gbps
vs
GTX 1630 1630
R7 M350 Radeon R7 M350
vs
RTX 3080 Mobile RTX 3080 Mobile
R9 M395X Mac Edition Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
vs
Pro 580X Pro 580X
R9 M295X Mac Edition Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
vs
Pro 580X Pro 580X
R9 M275X Radeon R9 M275X
vs
Vega 8 Embedded Vega 8 Embedded
PlayStation 4 GPU PlayStation 4 GPU
vs
Vita GPU

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.3 62 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 28452 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 M350 or GeForce GTX 1650, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.