GeForce RTX 5070 vs Radeon R7 M340

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 M340 with GeForce RTX 5070, including specs and performance data.

R7 M340
2015
4 GB DDR3
1.63

RTX 5070 outperforms R7 M340 by a whopping 4348% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking97321
Place by popularitynot in top-10048
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data72.57
Power efficiencyno data20.47
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameMesoGB205
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 May 2015 (10 years ago)4 March 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3206144
Compute units6no data
Core clock speed943 MHz2325 MHz
Boost clock speed1021 MHz2512 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 million31,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rate20.42482.3
Floating-point processing power0.6534 TFLOPS30.87 TFLOPS
ROPs880
TMUs20192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data245 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount4 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
Eyefinity+-
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.06.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed3.0
Vulkan+1.4
Mantle+-
CUDA-10.1
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R7 M340 1.63
RTX 5070 72.51
+4348%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 M340 651
RTX 5070 28940
+4345%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R7 M340 2148
RTX 5070 71642
+3235%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

R7 M340 5427
RTX 5070 137827
+2440%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R7 M340 1209
RTX 5070 56472
+4573%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

R7 M340 6153
RTX 5070 258137
+4095%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

R7 M340 69098
RTX 5070 862499
+1148%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14
−1464%
219
+1464%
1440p2−3
−6250%
127
+6250%
4K1−2
−8000%
81
+8000%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.51
1440pno data4.32
4Kno data6.78

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 5−6
−5520%
281
+5520%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 300−350
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−5767%
170−180
+5767%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 5−6
−4340%
222
+4340%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−5967%
180−190
+5967%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 300−350
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−5767%
170−180
+5767%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−10633%
322
+10633%
Fortnite 6−7
−4933%
300−350
+4933%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−3388%
270−280
+3388%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−16350%
329
+16350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−1660%
170−180
+1660%
Valorant 35−40
−1022%
400−450
+1022%

Full HD
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 5−6
−3780%
194
+3780%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−5967%
180−190
+5967%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 300−350
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
−718%
270−280
+718%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−5767%
170−180
+5767%
Dota 2 21
−4186%
900−950
+4186%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−10100%
306
+10100%
Fortnite 6−7
−4933%
300−350
+4933%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−3388%
270−280
+3388%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−14850%
299
+14850%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−8450%
170−180
+8450%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−5867%
170−180
+5867%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−1660%
170−180
+1660%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
−6129%
436
+6129%
Valorant 35−40
−1022%
400−450
+1022%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 5−6
−3680%
189
+3680%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−5967%
180−190
+5967%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−5767%
170−180
+5767%
Dota 2 18
−4344%
800−850
+4344%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−9567%
290
+9567%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−3388%
270−280
+3388%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−1660%
170−180
+1660%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
−5150%
210
+5150%
Valorant 35−40
−1022%
400−450
+1022%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 6−7
−4933%
300−350
+4933%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−21400%
210−220
+21400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−11
−5060%
500−550
+5060%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 140−150
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−1650%
170−180
+1650%
Valorant 9−10
−5289%
450−500
+5289%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 0−1 135
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−10200%
100−110
+10200%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−22100%
222
+22100%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−6000%
240−250
+6000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−8200%
166
+8200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−4933%
150−160
+4933%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−956%
160−170
+956%
Valorant 8−9
−4050%
300−350
+4050%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 50−55
Dota 2 2−3
−4150%
85−90
+4150%
Far Cry 5 0−1 116
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−3100%
95−100
+3100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−2533%
75−80
+2533%

1440p
High Preset

Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

4K
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 115
+0%
115
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150
+0%
150
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 73
+0%
73
+0%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

This is how R7 M340 and RTX 5070 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5070 is 1464% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5070 is 6250% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5070 is 8000% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 5070 is 22100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 5070 is ahead in 46 tests (82%)
  • there's a draw in 10 tests (18%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.63 72.51
Recency 5 May 2015 4 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

RTX 5070 has a 4348.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5070 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M340 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M340 is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 5070 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M340
Radeon R7 M340
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070
GeForce RTX 5070

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 340 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2452 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 M340 or GeForce RTX 5070, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.