Radeon Sky 500 vs R7 M275DX

Place in performance ranking	695	369
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	4.53
Architecture	GCN (2011−2017)	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code name	no data	Pitcairn
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	4 June 2014 (9 years ago)	27 March 2013 (11 years ago)
Current price	no data	$129

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	896	1280
Core clock speed	no data	950 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	150 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	76.00
Floating-point performance	no data	2,432 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R7 M275DX and Radeon Sky 500 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	no data	PCIe 3.0
Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	242 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Form factor	no data	full height / full length
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	no data	4 GB
Memory bus width	no data	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	4800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	154 GB/s
Shared memory	+	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	1x DisplayPort
Eyefinity	+	no data
DisplayPort count	no data	1
Dual-link DVI support	no data	1

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	no data	5.1
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	1.2
Vulkan	no data	1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−254%

85−90
+254%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

6−7
−250%

21−24

+250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −260%	18−20 +260%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Battlefield 5	8−9 −238%	27−30 +238%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −246%	45−50 +246%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%
Hitman 3	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −250%	35−40 +250%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −260%	18−20 +260%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Battlefield 5	8−9 −238%	27−30 +238%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −246%	45−50 +246%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%
Hitman 3	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −260%	18−20 +260%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −250%	35−40 +250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −238%	27−30 +238%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −260%	18−20 +260%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Battlefield 5	8−9 −238%	27−30 +238%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −238%	27−30 +238%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Hitman 3	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −250%	35−40 +250%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −260%	18−20 +260%
Far Cry New Dawn	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Hitman 3	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%