Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs Radeon R7 M275DX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
M260 M260DX M260X M265 M265DX M270 M270DX M275DX
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P3000 Mobile P3200 P3200 Max-Q P4000 Mobile P4000 Max-Q P4200 P4200 Max-Q P5000 Mobile P5000 X2 Mobile P5200 P5200 Max-Q Tesla P6 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 M275DX with Quadro P3200 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

R7 M275DX
2014
3.08

P3200 Max-Q outperforms R7 M275DX by a whopping 604% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R7 M275DX R7 M275DX
P3200 Max-Q P3200 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking798291
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.21
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameno dataGP104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date4 June 2014 (11 years ago)21 February 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8961792
Core clock speedno data1139 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1404 MHz
Number of transistorsno data7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data157.2
Floating-point processing powerno data5.032 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data112
L1 Cacheno data672 KB
L2 Cacheno data1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataMXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data6 GB
Memory bus widthno data192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1753 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data168.3 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24
−567%
160−170
+567%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−582%
75−80
+582%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−588%
55−60
+588%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 10−12
−582%
75−80
+582%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−582%
75−80
+582%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Fortnite 16−18
−547%
110−120
+547%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−567%
100−105
+567%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−588%
55−60
+588%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−588%
55−60
+588%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−579%
95−100
+579%
Valorant 45−50
−525%
300−310
+525%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 10−12
−582%
75−80
+582%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−582%
75−80
+582%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 47
−538%
300−310
+538%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
Dota 2 30−33
−600%
210−220
+600%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Fortnite 16−18
−547%
110−120
+547%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−567%
100−105
+567%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−588%
55−60
+588%
Grand Theft Auto V 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−588%
55−60
+588%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−579%
95−100
+579%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−600%
70−75
+600%
Valorant 45−50
−525%
300−310
+525%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−12
−582%
75−80
+582%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
Dota 2 30−33
−600%
210−220
+600%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−567%
100−105
+567%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−588%
55−60
+588%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−579%
95−100
+579%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−600%
70−75
+600%
Valorant 45−50
−525%
300−310
+525%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
−547%
110−120
+547%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−596%
160−170
+596%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−579%
190−200
+579%
Valorant 30−33
−600%
210−220
+600%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−567%
100−105
+567%
Valorant 14−16
−567%
100−105
+567%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%

This is how R7 M275DX and P3200 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • P3200 Max-Q is 567% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.08 21.69
Recency 4 June 2014 21 February 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm

P3200 Max-Q has a 604.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M275DX in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M275DX is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P3200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon R7 M275DX
Radeon R7 M275DX
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R7 M275DX Radeon R7 M275DX
vs
GTX 560M GeForce GTX 560M
P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
vs
Pro 5600M Radeon Pro 5600M
R7 M275DX Radeon R7 M275DX
vs
GTX 775M Mac Edition GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
R7 M275DX Radeon R7 M275DX
vs
R7 M445 R7 M445
R7 M275DX Radeon R7 M275DX
vs
R7 250E R7 250E
R7 M275DX Radeon R7 M275DX
vs
GT 740 GT 740
R7 M275DX Radeon R7 M275DX
vs
GT 705 OEM GT 705 OEM
R7 M275DX Radeon R7 M275DX
vs
Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200
R7 M275DX Radeon R7 M275DX
vs
P5000 X2 Mobile Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile
GT 745M GeForce GT 745M
vs
HD 7510M HD 7510M
GT 745M GeForce GT 745M
vs
ATI 9600 SE Radeon 9600 SE
GT 745M GeForce GT 745M
vs
HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2
GT 745M GeForce GT 745M
vs
Arc A380 Arc A380

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.5 2 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M275DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 26 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 M275DX or Quadro P3200 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.