GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile vs Radeon R7 M265DX

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 M265DX and GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R7 M265DX
2014
1.13

3080 Mobile outperforms R7 M265DX by a whopping 3157% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1089127
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data25.76
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameTopazGA104
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date12 October 2014 (10 years ago)12 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3846144
Core clock speed925 MHz1110 MHz
Boost clock speed940 MHz1545 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data115 Watt
Texture fill rate22.56296.6
Floating-point processing power0.7219 TFLOPS18.98 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs24192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L1 Cache96 KB6 MB
L2 Cache256 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R7 M265DX 1.13
RTX 3080 Mobile 36.80
+3157%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 M265DX 498
Samples: 3
RTX 3080 Mobile 16271
+3167%
Samples: 2777

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3−4
−3800%
117
+3800%
1440p2−3
−3550%
73
+3550%
4K1−2
−4300%
44
+4300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 212
+0%
212
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 121
+0%
121
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 119
+0%
119
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 205
+0%
205
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 96
+0%
96
+0%
Far Cry 5 129
+0%
129
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 194
+0%
194
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 148
+0%
148
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 104
+0%
104
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 140
+0%
140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 156
+0%
156
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 84
+0%
84
+0%
Dota 2 134
+0%
134
+0%
Far Cry 5 122
+0%
122
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 188
+0%
188
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 135
+0%
135
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 131
+0%
131
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 78
+0%
78
+0%
Metro Exodus 100
+0%
100
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 191
+0%
191
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 134
+0%
134
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 76
+0%
76
+0%
Dota 2 128
+0%
128
+0%
Far Cry 5 114
+0%
114
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 157
+0%
157
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 68
+0%
68
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 106
+0%
106
+0%
Valorant 179
+0%
179
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 101
+0%
101
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 94
+0%
94
+0%
Metro Exodus 58
+0%
58
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 108
+0%
108
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 48
+0%
48
+0%
Far Cry 5 103
+0%
103
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130
+0%
130
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 48
+0%
48
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 79
+0%
79
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 31
+0%
31
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 93
+0%
93
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 37
+0%
37
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70
+0%
70
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 67
+0%
67
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+0%
23
+0%
Dota 2 110
+0%
110
+0%
Far Cry 5 55
+0%
55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 87
+0%
87
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 27
+0%
27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

This is how R7 M265DX and RTX 3080 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3080 Mobile is 3800% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3080 Mobile is 3550% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3080 Mobile is 4300% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.13 36.80
Recency 12 October 2014 12 January 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm

RTX 3080 Mobile has a 3156.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M265DX in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M265DX
Radeon R7 M265DX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 29 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M265DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 852 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 M265DX or GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.