Radeon HD 6570 vs R7 M265
Aggregated performance score
HD 6570 outperforms R7 M265 by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 954 | 944 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | 0.03 | 0.07 |
Architecture | GCN (2011−2017) | TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) |
GPU code name | Opal XT / Mars | Turks |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | no data | reference |
Release date | 7 January 2014 (10 years ago) | 19 April 2011 (13 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $79 |
Current price | $585 | $66 (0.8x MSRP) |
Value for money
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
HD 6570 has 133% better value for money than R7 M265.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 480 |
Compute units | 6 | no data |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 825 MHz | 650 MHz |
Number of transistors | 1,550 million | 716 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 40 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 23.52 | 15.60 |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | 624.0 gflops |
Size and compatibility
Information on Radeon R7 M265 and Radeon HD 6570 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.1 x16 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | no data | 168 mm |
Width | no data | 1-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 32 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | no data |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Eyefinity | no data | 1 |
HDMI | no data | + |
DisplayPort support | no data | + |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
AppAcceleration | - | - |
CrossFire | no data | 1 |
Enduro | - | - |
FreeSync | 1 | no data |
HD3D | + | - |
PowerTune | + | - |
DualGraphics | 1 | no data |
TrueAudio | - | - |
ZeroCore | + | - |
Switchable graphics | 1 | no data |
UVD | no data | + |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | DirectX® 11 | DirectX® 11 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.2 |
Mantle | + | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
HD 6570 outperforms R7 M265 by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
HD 6570 outperforms R7 M265 by 2% in Passmark.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
R7 M265 outperforms HD 6570 by 57% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 14
+0%
| 14−16
+0%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
This is how R7 M265 and HD 6570 compete in popular games:
- HD 6570 is 0% faster than R7 M265 in 1080p
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 1.41 | 1.44 |
Recency | 7 January 2014 | 19 April 2011 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon R7 M265 and Radeon HD 6570.
Be aware that Radeon R7 M265 is a notebook card while Radeon HD 6570 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.