GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile vs Radeon R7 M265

Place in performance ranking	954	82
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	0.03	no data
Architecture	GCN (2011−2017)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	Opal XT / Mars	GN20-E6
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	7 January 2014 (10 years ago)	4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price	$585	no data

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	5888
Compute units	6	no data
Core clock speed	825 MHz	915 MHz
Boost clock speed	825 MHz	1480 MHz
Number of transistors	1,550 million	17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	125 Watt (80 - 125 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	23.52	248.2
Floating-point performance	633.6 gflops	no data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Radeon R7 M265 and GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	large
Bus support	PCIe 3.0 x8	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	32 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported GPU Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	-	no data
Enduro	-	no data
FreeSync	1	no data
HD3D	+	no data
PowerTune	+	no data
DualGraphics	1	no data
TrueAudio	-	no data
ZeroCore	+	no data
Switchable graphics	1	no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 11	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.3	6.6
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	Not Listed	3.0
Vulkan	no data	1.3
Mantle	+	no data
CUDA	no data	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 M265 1.41

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 42.03
+2881%

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon R7 M265 by 2881% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R7 M265 6175

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 81895
+1226%

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon R7 M265 by 1226% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R7 M265 1882

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 36970
+1864%

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon R7 M265 by 1864% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R7 M265 1336

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 27776
+1979%

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon R7 M265 by 1979% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R7 M265 8402

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 141689
+1586%

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon R7 M265 by 1586% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	14 −743%	118 +743%
1440p	2−3 −3550%	73 +3550%
4K	1−2 −4700%	48 +4700%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5

−3125%

129
+3125%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	70−75
Battlefield 5	0−1	110−120
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −1050%	110−120 +1050%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −2675%	111 +2675%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −12500%	120−130 +12500%
Hitman 3	2−3 −8350%	169 +8350%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −9000%	90−95 +9000%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −1600%	65−70 +1600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −1386%	100−110 +1386%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	70−75
Battlefield 5	0−1	110−120
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −1050%	110−120 +1050%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −2125%	89 +2125%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −12500%	120−130 +12500%
Hitman 3	2−3 −7900%	160 +7900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −9000%	90−95 +9000%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −4650%	95 +4650%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −1600%	65−70 +1600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −1700%	126 +1700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9 −1989%	188 +1989%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	70−75
Battlefield 5	0−1	110−120
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −1925%	81 +1925%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −12500%	120−130 +12500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −2475%	103 +2475%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −2267%	70−75 +2267%
Hitman 3	4−5 −2300%	96 +2300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −650%	60−65 +650%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	30−35
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 −1560%	83 +1560%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −4900%	50 +4900%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −4900%	100 +4900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −3000%	60−65 +3000%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1850%	35−40 +1850%
Hitman 3	2−3 −2600%	54 +2600%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −386%	30−35 +386%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	21−24