Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU vs Radeon R7 M260DX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
R5 M230 R5 M240 R5 M320 R5 M420 R5 M435 R6 M255DX R6 M335DX R6 M340DX R6 M435DX R7 M260DX R8 M350DX R8 M435DX
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU 4-Core iGPU (Arc) 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 M260DX and Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R7 M260DX
2014
1.95

Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU outperforms R7 M260DX by a whopping 496% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R7 M260DX R7 M260DX
Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking945454
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)no data
GPU code nameJetno data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2014 (12 years ago)5 January 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32032
Core clock speed780 MHzno data
Boost clock speed855 MHz2450 MHz
Number of transistors690 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nmno data
Texture fill rate17.10no data
Floating-point processing power0.5472 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs20no data
L1 Cache80 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)no data
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD5−6
−560%
33
+560%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

This is how R7 M260DX and Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU compete in popular games:

  • Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU is 560% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 54 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.95 11.62
Recency 7 January 2014 5 January 2026

Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU has a 495.9% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 11 years.

The Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M260DX in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon R7 M260DX
Radeon R7 M260DX
Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R7 M260DX Radeon R7 M260DX
vs
GT 445M GeForce GT 445M
Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
vs
R9 M395 Radeon R9 M395
R7 M260DX Radeon R7 M260DX
vs
HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
R8 M435DX AMD Radeon R8 M435DX
vs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 64EU Mobile Plus Graphics G7 64EU Mobile
R3 Mobile Graphics AMD Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics
vs
HD 8610G IGP HD 8610G IGP
R7 M260DX AMD Radeon R7 M260DX
vs
HD Graphics P3000 Graphics P3000
R7 M260DX AMD Radeon R7 M260DX
vs
T600 T600
R7 M260DX AMD Radeon R7 M260DX
vs
Go 7950 GTX MXM-IV Go 7950 GTX MXM-IV
R6 M335DX AMD Radeon R6 M335DX
vs
GTX 1650 GTX 1650
R6 M335DX AMD Radeon R6 M335DX
vs
GTX 1660 GTX 1660
R6 M335DX AMD Radeon R6 M335DX
vs
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 Lake-U Xe Graphics G1
R6 M335DX AMD Radeon R6 M335DX
vs
Graphics 384SP Graphics 384SP
R6 M335DX AMD Radeon R6 M335DX
vs
RX 7900 XT RX 7900 XT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.9 18 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M260DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 M260DX or Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.