GeForce FX 5200 Ultra vs Radeon R7 (Kaveri)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 (Kaveri) with GeForce FX 5200 Ultra, including specs and performance data.

R7 (Kaveri)
2014
1.46
+4767%

R7 (Kaveri) outperforms 5200 Ultra by a whopping 4767% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10311556
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 (2014)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameKaveriNV34 A2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 June 2014 (11 years ago)6 March 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speed553 MHz325 MHz
Boost clock speed686 MHzno data
Number of transistors2410 Million45 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Texture fill rateno data1.300
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Lengthno data171 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data128 MB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data325 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data10.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)9.0a
OpenGLno data1.5 (2.1)
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14-0−1

Cost per frame, $

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Fortnite 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 0−1
Valorant 35−40 0−1

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 18−20 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Fortnite 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8 0−1
Valorant 35−40 0−1

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 18−20 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 0−1
Valorant 35−40 0−1

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 5−6 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−11 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16 0−1
Valorant 6−7 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 0−1
Valorant 7−8 0−1

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.46 0.03
Recency 4 June 2014 6 March 2003
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm

R7 (Kaveri) has a 4766.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R7 (Kaveri) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX 5200 Ultra in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 (Kaveri) is a notebook graphics card while GeForce FX 5200 Ultra is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 (Kaveri)
Radeon R7 (Kaveri)
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Ultra
GeForce FX 5200 Ultra

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 13 votes

Rate Radeon R7 (Kaveri) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 7 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5200 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 (Kaveri) or GeForce FX 5200 Ultra, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.