UHD Graphics vs Radeon R7 (Carrizo)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon R7 (Carrizo) and UHD Graphics, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
UHD Graphics outperforms R7 (Carrizo) by a whopping 180% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 943 | 651 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 3 |
| Power efficiency | 3.99 | 39.12 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016) | Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) |
| GPU code name | Carrizo | Jasper Lake GT1 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 4 June 2015 (10 years ago) | 11 January 2021 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 512 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 2410 Million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12-35 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 12.00 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 0.384 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 8 |
| TMUs | no data | 16 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | no data | Ring Bus |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | no data | System Shared |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.2 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 10
−170%
| 27−30
+170%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−167%
|
8−9
+167%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−150%
|
10−11
+150%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 7−8
−157%
|
18−20
+157%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 4−5
−150%
|
10−11
+150%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−167%
|
8−9
+167%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−150%
|
10−11
+150%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−180%
|
14−16
+180%
|
| Fortnite | 8−9
−163%
|
21−24
+163%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
−170%
|
27−30
+170%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 3−4
−167%
|
8−9
+167%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 7−8
−157%
|
18−20
+157%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−173%
|
30−33
+173%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−163%
|
100−105
+163%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 4−5
−150%
|
10−11
+150%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−167%
|
8−9
+167%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 24
−171%
|
65−70
+171%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−150%
|
10−11
+150%
|
| Dota 2 | 21−24
−162%
|
55−60
+162%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−180%
|
14−16
+180%
|
| Fortnite | 8−9
−163%
|
21−24
+163%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
−170%
|
27−30
+170%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 3−4
−167%
|
8−9
+167%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 3−4
−167%
|
8−9
+167%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 7−8
−157%
|
18−20
+157%
|
| Metro Exodus | 3−4
−167%
|
8−9
+167%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−173%
|
30−33
+173%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6
−167%
|
16−18
+167%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−163%
|
100−105
+163%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 4−5
−150%
|
10−11
+150%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−150%
|
10−11
+150%
|
| Dota 2 | 21−24
−162%
|
55−60
+162%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−180%
|
14−16
+180%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
−170%
|
27−30
+170%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 7−8
−157%
|
18−20
+157%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−173%
|
30−33
+173%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
−163%
|
21−24
+163%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−163%
|
100−105
+163%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 8−9
−163%
|
21−24
+163%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
−150%
|
10−11
+150%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 12−14
−169%
|
35−40
+169%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 18−20
−178%
|
50−55
+178%
|
| Valorant | 12−14
−169%
|
35−40
+169%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−150%
|
5−6
+150%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−180%
|
14−16
+180%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 2−3
−150%
|
5−6
+150%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 3−4
−167%
|
8−9
+167%
|
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
−150%
|
40−45
+150%
|
| Valorant | 9−10
−167%
|
24−27
+167%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Dota 2 | 4−5
−150%
|
10−11
+150%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4
−167%
|
8−9
+167%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 3−4
−167%
|
8−9
+167%
|
This is how R7 (Carrizo) and UHD Graphics compete in popular games:
- UHD Graphics is 170% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.83 | 5.13 |
| Recency | 4 June 2015 | 11 January 2021 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 10 Watt |
UHD Graphics has a 180.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.
The UHD Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 (Carrizo) in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
