Tesla P4 vs Radeon R7 (Carrizo)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon R7 (Carrizo) with Tesla P4, including specs and performance data.
Tesla P4 outperforms R7 (Carrizo) by a whopping 1093% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 940 | 276 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 3.98 | 22.18 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
| GPU code name | Carrizo | GP104 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 4 June 2015 (10 years ago) | 13 September 2016 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 512 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 886 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | 1114 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 2410 Million | 7,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12-35 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 178.2 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 5.704 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 64 |
| TMUs | no data | 160 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 168 mm |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 1502 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 192.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | - | 6.1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 10
−1000%
| 110−120
+1000%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
−950%
|
21−24
+950%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−1025%
|
45−50
+1025%
|
| God of War | 6−7
−1067%
|
70−75
+1067%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 4−5
−1025%
|
45−50
+1025%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
−950%
|
21−24
+950%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−1025%
|
45−50
+1025%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−1000%
|
55−60
+1000%
|
| Fortnite | 8−9
−1088%
|
95−100
+1088%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
−1000%
|
110−120
+1000%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 3−4
−1067%
|
35−40
+1067%
|
| God of War | 6−7
−1067%
|
70−75
+1067%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−1082%
|
130−140
+1082%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−1084%
|
450−500
+1084%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 4−5
−1025%
|
45−50
+1025%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
−950%
|
21−24
+950%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 24
−1067%
|
280−290
+1067%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−1025%
|
45−50
+1025%
|
| Dota 2 | 21−24
−1090%
|
250−260
+1090%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−1000%
|
55−60
+1000%
|
| Fortnite | 8−9
−1088%
|
95−100
+1088%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
−1000%
|
110−120
+1000%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 3−4
−1067%
|
35−40
+1067%
|
| God of War | 6−7
−1067%
|
70−75
+1067%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 3−4
−1067%
|
35−40
+1067%
|
| Metro Exodus | 3−4
−1067%
|
35−40
+1067%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−1082%
|
130−140
+1082%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6
−1067%
|
70−75
+1067%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−1084%
|
450−500
+1084%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 4−5
−1025%
|
45−50
+1025%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−1025%
|
45−50
+1025%
|
| Dota 2 | 21−24
−1090%
|
250−260
+1090%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−1000%
|
55−60
+1000%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
−1000%
|
110−120
+1000%
|
| God of War | 6−7
−1067%
|
70−75
+1067%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−1082%
|
130−140
+1082%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
−1088%
|
95−100
+1088%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−1084%
|
450−500
+1084%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 8−9
−1088%
|
95−100
+1088%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
−1025%
|
45−50
+1025%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 12−14
−1054%
|
150−160
+1054%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 18−20
−1067%
|
210−220
+1067%
|
| Valorant | 12−14
−1054%
|
150−160
+1054%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−900%
|
10−11
+900%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−950%
|
21−24
+950%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−1000%
|
55−60
+1000%
|
| God of War | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−900%
|
10−11
+900%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 3−4
−1067%
|
35−40
+1067%
|
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−1033%
|
170−180
+1033%
|
| Valorant | 9−10
−1011%
|
100−105
+1011%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Dota 2 | 4−5
−1025%
|
45−50
+1025%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| God of War | 1−2
−900%
|
10−11
+900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4
−1067%
|
35−40
+1067%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 3−4
−1067%
|
35−40
+1067%
|
This is how R7 (Carrizo) and Tesla P4 compete in popular games:
- Tesla P4 is 1000% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.83 | 21.84 |
| Recency | 4 June 2015 | 13 September 2016 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 75 Watt |
R7 (Carrizo) has 525% lower power consumption.
Tesla P4, on the other hand, has a 1093.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.
The Tesla P4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 (Carrizo) in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon R7 (Carrizo) is a notebook graphics card while Tesla P4 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
