UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) vs Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) with UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake), including specs and performance data.
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) outperforms R7 (Bristol Ridge) by an impressive 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 950 | 791 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 3.05 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 1.2 (2016) | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) |
| GPU code name | Bristol Ridge | Rocket Lake Xe |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 June 2016 (9 years ago) | 30 March 2021 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 512 | 32 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | 1450 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 2410 Million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12-45 Watt | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | no data |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_0) | 12_1 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 14
−35.7%
| 19
+35.7%
|
| 1440p | 9−10
−77.8%
| 16
+77.8%
|
| 4K | 5−6
−80%
| 9
+80%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
−400%
|
10−11
+400%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
| God of War | 6−7
−117%
|
13
+117%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 4−5
−175%
|
10−12
+175%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
−400%
|
10−11
+400%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−125%
|
9−10
+125%
|
| Fortnite | 7−8
−129%
|
16−18
+129%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
−50%
|
14−16
+50%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 3−4
−133%
|
7−8
+133%
|
| God of War | 6−7
−33.3%
|
8−9
+33.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−27.3%
|
14−16
+27.3%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−73%
|
64
+73%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 4−5
−175%
|
10−12
+175%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
−400%
|
10−11
+400%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 35−40
−50%
|
55−60
+50%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
| Dota 2 | 16
−119%
|
35
+119%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−125%
|
9−10
+125%
|
| Fortnite | 7−8
−129%
|
16−18
+129%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
−50%
|
14−16
+50%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 3−4
−133%
|
7−8
+133%
|
| God of War | 6−7
−33.3%
|
8−9
+33.3%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 5
−80%
|
9−10
+80%
|
| Metro Exodus | 3−4
−100%
|
6
+100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−27.3%
|
14−16
+27.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
−25%
|
10−11
+25%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−37.8%
|
51
+37.8%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 4−5
−175%
|
10−12
+175%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
| Dota 2 | 14
−129%
|
32
+129%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−125%
|
9−10
+125%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
−50%
|
14−16
+50%
|
| God of War | 6−7
−33.3%
|
8−9
+33.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−27.3%
|
14−16
+27.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
−25%
|
10−11
+25%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−27%
|
45−50
+27%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 7−8
−129%
|
16−18
+129%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 12−14
−76.9%
|
21−24
+76.9%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 18−20
−50%
|
27−30
+50%
|
| Valorant | 12−14
−200%
|
36
+200%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−150%
|
5−6
+150%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−40%
|
7−8
+40%
|
| God of War | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 3−4
−100%
|
6−7
+100%
|
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16−18
+6.7%
|
| Valorant | 9−10
−66.7%
|
14−16
+66.7%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Dota 2 | 3−4
−300%
|
12
+300%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| God of War | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
This is how R7 (Bristol Ridge) and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) compete in popular games:
- UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is 36% faster in 1080p
- UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is 78% faster in 1440p
- UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is 80% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is 400% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) performs better in 53 tests (96%)
- there's a draw in 2 tests (4%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.80 | 3.02 |
| Recency | 1 June 2016 | 30 March 2021 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) has a 67.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) is a notebook graphics card while UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
