Radeon RX 7600 XT vs R7 (Bristol Ridge)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) with Radeon RX 7600 XT, including specs and performance data.

R7 (Bristol Ridge)
2016
12 Watt
1.95

RX 7600 XT outperforms R7 (Bristol Ridge) by a whopping 2213% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking86166
Place by popularitynot in top-10069
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.2429.82
ArchitectureGCN 1.2 (2015−2016)RDNA 3.0 (2022)
GPU code nameBristol RidgeNavi 33
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329
Current price$80 $477 (1.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7600 XT has 12325% better value for money than R7 (Bristol Ridge).

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5122048
Boost clock speed900 MHz2755 MHz
Number of transistors2410 Million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12-45 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rateno data352.6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) and Radeon RX 7600 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data204 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data18 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkanno data1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 (Bristol Ridge) 1.95
RX 7600 XT 45.10
+2213%

RX 7600 XT outperforms R7 (Bristol Ridge) by 2213% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R7 (Bristol Ridge) 754
RX 7600 XT 17418
+2210%

RX 7600 XT outperforms R7 (Bristol Ridge) by 2210% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
−1959%
350−400
+1959%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 4−5

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 3−4
Battlefield 5 0−1 1−2
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 5−6
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 4−5
Far Cry 5 0−1 3−4
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 5−6
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 7−8
Hitman 3 0−1 4−5
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 16−18
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 4−5
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 10−11
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 12−14

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 3−4
Battlefield 5 0−1 1−2
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 5−6
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 4−5
Far Cry 5 0−1 3−4
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 5−6
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 7−8
Hitman 3 0−1 4−5
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 16−18
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 4−5
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 10−11
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 5−6
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 12−14

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 3−4
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 5−6
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 4−5
Far Cry 5 0−1 3−4
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 7−8
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 16−18
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 10−11
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 5−6
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 12−14

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 4−5

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 3−4
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 2−3

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 1−2
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 5−6
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 1−2
Far Cry 5 0−1 3−4
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 2−3
Hitman 3 0−1 7−8
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 6−7
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 1−2
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 5−6

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 1−2
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 2−3

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 2−3
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 1−2
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 2−3
Metro Exodus 0−1 4−5
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 3−4

This is how R7 (Bristol Ridge) and RX 7600 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600 XT is 1959% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.95 45.10
Recency 1 June 2016 8 January 2024
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 190 Watt

The Radeon RX 7600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7600 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT
Radeon RX 7600 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 41 vote

Rate Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 278 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.