Radeon Next vs R7 (Bristol Ridge)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking961not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.07no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.2 (2016)GCN 6.0
GPU code nameBristol RidgeNavi 10
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 June 2016 (9 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speedno data1000 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors2410 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12-45 Wattno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory bus width64/128 Bitno data
Memory clock speedno data14000 MHz
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12.0 (12_1)
OpenGLno data4.6

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm

Radeon Next has a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) and Radeon Next. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Next is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
AMD Radeon Next
Radeon Next

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 45 votes

Rate Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Next on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) or Radeon Next, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.