Radeon R7 M350 2GB vs Next

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 6.0GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameNavi 10Litho
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data5 May 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed1000 MHz825 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data950 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm28 nm
Texture fill rateno data19.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6336 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data24
L1 Cacheno data96 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data64 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5 (5.1)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data2.1 (1.2)
Vulkan-1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm

Radeon Next has a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Next and Radeon R7 M350 2GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Next is a desktop graphics card while Radeon R7 M350 2GB is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Next
Radeon Next
AMD Radeon R7 M350 2GB
Radeon R7 M350 2GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Next on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 4 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M350 2GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Next or Radeon R7 M350 2GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.