HD Graphics vs Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) with HD Graphics, including specs and performance data.

R7 (Bristol Ridge)
2016
12 Watt
1.90
+153%

R7 (Bristol Ridge) outperforms HD Graphics by a whopping 153% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9091162
Place by popularitynot in top-10069
Power efficiency3.011.53
ArchitectureGCN 1.2 (2016)Generation 7.0 (2012−2013)
GPU code nameBristol RidgeIvy Bridge GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)1 April 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51248
Core clock speedno data650 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz1050 MHz
Number of transistors2410 Million392 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12-45 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data6.300
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1008 TFLOPS
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus width64/128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)11.1 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.0
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R7 (Bristol Ridge) 1.90
+153%
HD Graphics 0.75

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 (Bristol Ridge) 754
+152%
HD Graphics 299

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R7 (Bristol Ridge) 1013
+238%
HD Graphics 300

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
+160%
5−6
−160%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Dota 2 9
+200%
3−4
−200%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Fortnite 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Grand Theft Auto V 5
+400%
1−2
−400%
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 26
+160%
10−11
−160%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
+167%
3−4
−167%
World of Tanks 35−40
+171%
14−16
−171%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Dota 2 14
+180%
5−6
−180%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1
World of Tanks 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Valorant 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Fortnite 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
Valorant 2−3 0−1

This is how R7 (Bristol Ridge) and HD Graphics compete in popular games:

  • R7 (Bristol Ridge) is 160% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.90 0.75
Recency 1 June 2016 1 April 2012
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 35 Watt

R7 (Bristol Ridge) has a 153.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and 191.7% lower power consumption.

HD Graphics, on the other hand, has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) is a notebook card while HD Graphics is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
Intel HD Graphics
HD Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 42 votes

Rate Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 2260 votes

Rate HD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) or HD Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.