GeForce RTX 2060 vs Radeon R7 A360

Place in performance ranking	922	118
Place by popularity	not in top-100	34
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	21.05
Architecture	GCN 3.0 (2014−2017)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Meso	Turing TU106
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	5 May 2015 (9 years ago)	6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$349
Current price	$2500	$397 (1.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

R7 A360 and RTX 2060 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	1920
Core clock speed	725 MHz	1320 MHz
Boost clock speed	1125 MHz	1620 MHz
Number of transistors	1,550 million	10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	175 Watt
Texture fill rate	27.00	201.6
Floating-point performance	864.0 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	229 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	336.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	no data	+
G-SYNC support	no data	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12
Shader Model	6.0	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 A360 1.57

RTX 2060 36.64
+2234%

GeForce RTX 2060 outperforms Radeon R7 A360 by 2234% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R7 A360 607

RTX 2060 14149
+2231%

GeForce RTX 2060 outperforms Radeon R7 A360 by 2231% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	5−6 −2300%	120 +2300%
1440p	3−4 −2333%	73 +2333%
4K	2−3 −2400%	50 +2400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

60−65
−2166%

1450−1500

+2166%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	92 −2183%	2100−2150 +2183%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	79 −2178%	1800−1850 +2178%
Battlefield 5	157 −2225%	3650−3700 +2225%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	106 −2211%	2450−2500 +2211%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 −2166%	1450−1500 +2166%
Far Cry 5	114 −2225%	2650−2700 +2225%
Far Cry New Dawn	128 −2205%	2950−3000 +2205%
Forza Horizon 4	140 −2221%	3250−3300 +2221%
Hitman 3	98 −2196%	2250−2300 +2196%
Horizon Zero Dawn	211 −2222%	4900−4950 +2222%
Metro Exodus	144 −2226%	3350−3400 +2226%
Red Dead Redemption 2	109 −2194%	2500−2550 +2194%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	140−150 −2221%	3250−3300 +2221%
Watch Dogs: Legion	101 −2227%	2350−2400 +2227%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	78 −2208%	1800−1850 +2208%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	64 −2166%	1450−1500 +2166%
Battlefield 5	140 −2221%	3250−3300 +2221%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	96 −2192%	2200−2250 +2192%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 −2166%	1450−1500 +2166%
Far Cry 5	91 −2208%	2100−2150 +2208%
Far Cry New Dawn	95 −2216%	2200−2250 +2216%
Forza Horizon 4	194 −2220%	4500−4550 +2220%
Hitman 3	48 −2192%	1100−1150 +2192%
Horizon Zero Dawn	247 −2228%	5750−5800 +2228%
Metro Exodus	118 −2231%	2750−2800 +2231%
Red Dead Redemption 2	105 −2233%	2450−2500 +2233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	140−150 −2221%	3250−3300 +2221%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	136 −2216%	3150−3200 +2216%
Watch Dogs: Legion	244 −2216%	5650−5700 +2216%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	56 −2221%	1300−1350 +2221%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55 −2173%	1250−1300 +2173%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	71 −2224%	1650−1700 +2224%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 −2166%	1450−1500 +2166%
Far Cry 5	70 −2186%	1600−1650 +2186%
Forza Horizon 4	105 −2233%	2450−2500 +2233%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120 −2233%	2800−2850 +2233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	140−150 −2221%	3250−3300 +2221%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	73 −2229%	1700−1750 +2229%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45 −2233%	1050−1100 +2233%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

96
−2192%

2200−2250

+2192%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 −2186%	1600−1650 +2186%
Far Cry New Dawn	98 −2196%	2250−2300 +2196%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −2208%	900−950 +2208%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	42 −2162%	950−1000 +2162%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65 −2208%	1500−1550 +2208%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −2221%	650−700 +2221%
Far Cry 5	65−70 −2173%	1500−1550 +2173%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −2203%	1750−1800 +2203%
Hitman 3	54 −2215%	1250−1300 +2215%
Horizon Zero Dawn	89 −2203%	2050−2100 +2203%
Metro Exodus	76 −2203%	1750−1800 +2203%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85−90 −2230%	2050−2100 +2230%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 −2208%	1200−1250 +2208%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30 −2233%	700−750 +2233%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

74
−2197%

1700−1750

+2197%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40 −2150%	900−950 +2150%
Far Cry New Dawn	37 −2197%	850−900 +2197%
Hitman 3	30−33 −2233%	700−750 +2233%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −2183%	1050−1100 +2183%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	32 −2088%	700−750 +2088%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	51 −2155%	1150−1200 +2155%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	28 −2221%	650−700 +2221%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24 −2192%	550−600 +2192%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	28 −2221%	650−700 +2221%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −2233%	280−290 +2233%
Far Cry 5	25 −2100%	550−600 +2100%
Forza Horizon 4	59 −2188%	1350−1400 +2188%
Horizon Zero Dawn	52 −2208%	1200−1250 +2208%
Metro Exodus	42 −2162%	950−1000 +2162%
Watch Dogs: Legion	17 −1959%	350−400 +1959%