ATI Radeon 7000 vs R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8271590
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameKaveri SpectreRV100
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date14 January 2014 (11 years ago)19 February 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speed720 MHz183 MHz
Number of transistorsno data30 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data23 Watt
Texture fill rateno data0.55
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data3

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data32 MB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data183 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.928 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)7.0
OpenGLno data1.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 9−10 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 10−11 no data
Counter-Strike 2 9−10 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 no data
Far Cry 5 8−9 no data
Fortnite 14−16 no data
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 no data
Forza Horizon 5 7−8 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 no data
Valorant 45−50 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 10−11 no data
Counter-Strike 2 9−10 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 no data
Dota 2 29 no data
Far Cry 5 8−9 no data
Fortnite 14−16 no data
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 no data
Forza Horizon 5 7−8 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 9 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9 no data
Metro Exodus 5−6 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10 no data
Valorant 45−50 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−11 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 no data
Dota 2 26 no data
Far Cry 5 8−9 no data
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6 no data
Valorant 45−50 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 14−16 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 no data
Metro Exodus 1−2 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27 no data
Valorant 27−30 no data

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Far Cry 5 5−6 no data
Forza Horizon 4 7−8 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 5−6 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 14−16 no data

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Dota 2 8−9 no data
Far Cry 5 1−2 no data
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 January 2014 19 February 2001
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm

R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and Radeon 7000. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
ATI Radeon 7000
Radeon 7000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 16 votes

Rate Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 200 votes

Rate Radeon 7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) or Radeon 7000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.