Radeon RX 6750 XT vs R7 370

Place in the ranking	411	47
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	6.65	51.85
Power efficiency	7.28	14.81
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Trinidad	Navi 22
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Design	reference	no data
Release date	18 June 2015 (9 years ago)	3 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$149	$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6750 XT has 680% better value for money than R7 370.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	2560
Core clock speed	no data	2150 MHz
Boost clock speed	975 MHz	2600 MHz
Number of transistors	2,800 million	17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	62.40	416.0
Floating-point processing power	1.997 TFLOPS	13.31 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	64
TMUs	64	160
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	152 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1 x 6-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	975 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	179.2 GB/s	432.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Eyefinity	+	-
Number of Eyefinity displays	6	no data
HDMI	+	+
DisplayPort support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	+	-
CrossFire	+	-
FreeSync	+	-
TrueAudio	+	-
VCE	+	-
DDMA audio	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.1
Vulkan	+	1.3
Mantle	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 370 11.69

RX 6750 XT 54.04
+362%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 370 4503

RX 6750 XT 20819
+362%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R7 370 8519

RX 6750 XT 48327
+467%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

R7 370 28723

RX 6750 XT 104004
+262%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R7 370 5961

RX 6750 XT 37609
+531%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

R7 370 39809

RX 6750 XT 170993
+330%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

R7 370 323114

RX 6750 XT 529598
+63.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	47 −247%	163 +247%
1440p	65 −30.8%	85 +30.8%
4K	18 −172%	49 +172%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.17	3.37
1440p	2.29	6.46
4K	8.28	11.20

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

18−20

−817%

165
+817%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 −315%	110−120 +315%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −422%	90−95 +422%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −362%	170−180 +362%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −333%	100−110 +333%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −606%	127 +606%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −289%	100−110 +289%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −306%	130−140 +306%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −181%	210−220 +181%
Hitman 3	21−24 −414%	110−120 +414%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 −235%	200−210 +235%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −295%	150−160 +295%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −247%	110−120 +247%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −458%	210−220 +458%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −112%	140−150 +112%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 −315%	110−120 +315%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −422%	90−95 +422%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −362%	170−180 +362%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −333%	100−110 +333%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −506%	109 +506%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −289%	100−110 +289%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −306%	130−140 +306%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −181%	210−220 +181%
Hitman 3	21−24 −414%	110−120 +414%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 −235%	200−210 +235%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −295%	150−160 +295%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −247%	110−120 +247%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −700%	304 +700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	89 −25.8%	110−120 +25.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −112%	140−150 +112%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 −315%	110−120 +315%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −422%	90−95 +422%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −333%	100−110 +333%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −444%	98 +444%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −289%	100−110 +289%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −181%	210−220 +181%
Hitman 3	21−24 −414%	110−120 +414%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 −239%	210 +239%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −584%	260 +584%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	22 −514%	135 +514%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −44.1%	98 +44.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35

−247%

110−120
+247%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −387%	110−120 +387%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −361%	80−85 +361%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −408%	60−65 +408%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 −700%	60−65 +700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −433%	60−65 +433%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −900%	60 +900%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −385%	60−65 +385%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −375%	260−270 +375%
Hitman 3	14−16 −400%	75−80 +400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −558%	158 +558%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −563%	126 +563%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −933%	186 +933%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −633%	85−90 +633%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 −207%	220−230 +207%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

−384%

90−95
+384%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −436%	55−60 +436%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −525%	50−55 +525%
Hitman 3	8−9 −463%	45−50 +463%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −294%	210−220 +294%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −660%	75−80 +660%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −690%	79 +690%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −471%	40−45 +471%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −660%	35−40 +660%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −533%	35−40 +533%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1200%	26 +1200%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −483%	35−40 +483%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −433%	80−85 +433%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −1000%	99 +1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −925%	41 +925%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−12

−373%

50−55
+373%

This is how R7 370 and RX 6750 XT compete in popular games:

RX 6750 XT is 247% faster in 1080p
RX 6750 XT is 31% faster in 1440p
RX 6750 XT is 172% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6750 XT is 1200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RX 6750 XT surpassed R7 370 in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	11.69	54.04
Recency	18 June 2015	3 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	250 Watt

R7 370 has 127.3% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 XT, on the other hand, has a 362.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 370 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.