HD Graphics 2000 vs Radeon R7 370

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 370 with HD Graphics 2000, including specs and performance data.

R7 370
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 110 Watt
10.98
+2012%

R7 370 outperforms HD Graphics 2000 by a whopping 2012% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4441253
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.27no data
Power efficiency7.17no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Generation 6.0 (2011)
GPU code nameTrinidadSandy Bridge GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date18 June 2015 (9 years ago)1 February 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102448
Core clock speedno data850 MHz
Boost clock speed975 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Wattunknown
Texture fill rate62.408.100
Floating-point processing power1.997 TFLOPS0.1296 TFLOPS
ROPs321
TMUs646

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length152 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed975 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
TrueAudio+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1211.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.63.1
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan+N/A
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R7 370 10.98
+2012%
HD Graphics 2000 0.52

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 370 4497
+2011%
HD Graphics 2000 213

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

R7 370 28723
+3107%
HD Graphics 2000 896

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD46
+318%
11
−318%
1440p57
+2750%
2−3
−2750%
4K200−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.24no data
1440p2.61no data
4K7.45no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+2850%
2−3
−2850%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+300%
5−6
−300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+2300%
2−3
−2300%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+2850%
2−3
−2850%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+3500%
1−2
−3500%
Fortnite 106
+2020%
5−6
−2020%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+1075%
4−5
−1075%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+3300%
1−2
−3300%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+300%
5−6
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 38
+443%
7−8
−443%
Valorant 100−105
+257%
27−30
−257%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+2300%
2−3
−2300%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+2850%
2−3
−2850%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+841%
16−18
−841%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Dota 2 75−80
+591%
10−12
−591%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+3500%
1−2
−3500%
Fortnite 41
+4000%
1−2
−4000%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+1075%
4−5
−1075%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+3300%
1−2
−3300%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+2100%
2−3
−2100%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+300%
5−6
−300%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30
+329%
7−8
−329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
+600%
5−6
−600%
Valorant 100−105
+257%
27−30
−257%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+2300%
2−3
−2300%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Dota 2 75−80
+591%
10−12
−591%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+3500%
1−2
−3500%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+1075%
4−5
−1075%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+300%
5−6
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+457%
7−8
−457%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+340%
5−6
−340%
Valorant 20
−40%
27−30
+40%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30
+2900%
1−2
−2900%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20−22 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 81
+8000%
1−2
−8000%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 0−1
Metro Exodus 12−14 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+2167%
3−4
−2167%
Valorant 120−130
+2300%
5−6
−2300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+2700%
1−2
−2700%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 0−1
Far Cry 5 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45
+2150%
2−3
−2150%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+46.7%
14−16
−46.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7 0−1
Metro Exodus 7−8 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 0−1
Valorant 55−60
+1833%
3−4
−1833%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 5−6 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Dota 2 40−45
+3900%
1−2
−3900%
Far Cry 5 10−12 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 18−20 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%

This is how R7 370 and HD Graphics 2000 compete in popular games:

  • R7 370 is 318% faster in 1080p
  • R7 370 is 2750% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the R7 370 is 8000% faster.
  • in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD Graphics 2000 is 40% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • R7 370 is ahead in 30 tests (97%)
  • HD Graphics 2000 is ahead in 1 test (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.98 0.52
Recency 18 June 2015 1 February 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm

R7 370 has a 2011.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R7 370 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 370 is a desktop card while HD Graphics 2000 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 370
Radeon R7 370
Intel HD Graphics 2000
HD Graphics 2000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 499 votes

Rate Radeon R7 370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 1394 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 370 or HD Graphics 2000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.