TITAN V CEO Edition vs Radeon R7 350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 350 and TITAN V CEO Edition, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.


R7 350
2016
2 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
5.16

TITAN V CEO Edition outperforms R7 350 by a whopping 687% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking673116
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.2212.51
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameCape VerdeGV100
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date6 July 2016 (9 years ago)21 June 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5125120
Core clock speed800 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1455 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate25.60465.6
Floating-point processing power0.8192 TFLOPS14.9 TFLOPS
ROPs16128
TMUs32320
Tensor Coresno data640
L1 Cache128 KB10 MB
L2 Cache256 KB6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length168 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB32 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz848 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s868.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-7.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.16 40.62
Recency 6 July 2016 21 June 2018
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 250 Watt

R7 350 has 355% lower power consumption.

TITAN V CEO Edition, on the other hand, has a 687% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133% more advanced lithography process.

The TITAN V CEO Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 350 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 582 votes

Rate Radeon R7 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 22 votes

Rate TITAN V CEO Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 350 or TITAN V CEO Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.