Radeon HD 6770M vs R7 350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon HD 7730 Radeon HD 7750 Radeon HD 7770 Radeon HD 8730 OEM Radeon HD 8740 OEM Radeon HD 8760 OEM Radeon R7 250E Radeon R7 250X Radeon R7 350 Radeon R7 450 OEM Radeon R9 255 OEM Radeon RX 540 OEM
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon HD 6610M Radeon HD 6630M Radeon HD 6630M Mac Edition Radeon HD 6650M Radeon HD 6730M Radeon HD 6750M Radeon HD 6750M Mac Edition Radeon HD 6770M Radeon HD 6770M Mac Edition Radeon HD 7610M Radeon HD 7650M Rebrand Radeon HD 7670M Rebrand

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 350 with Radeon HD 6770M, including specs and performance data.

R7 350
2016
2 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
5.47
+123%

R7 350 outperforms HD 6770M by a whopping 123% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

R7 350 R7 350
HD 6770M HD 6770M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking613842
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.984.92
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameCape VerdeWhistler
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 July 2016 (8 years ago)4 January 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512480
Core clock speed800 MHz725 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million716 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate25.6017.40
Floating-point processing power0.8192 TFLOPS0.696 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs3224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s57.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p50−55
+117%
23
−117%
Full HD55−60
+120%
25
−120%
1200p24−27
+100%
12
−100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how R7 350 and HD 6770M compete in popular games:

  • R7 350 is 117% faster in 900p
  • R7 350 is 120% faster in 1080p
  • R7 350 is 100% faster in 1200p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 59 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 5.47 2.45
Recency 6 July 2016 4 January 2011
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 35 Watt

R7 350 has a 123.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

HD 6770M, on the other hand, has 57.1% lower power consumption.

The Radeon R7 350 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6770M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 350 is a desktop card while Radeon HD 6770M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon R7 350
Radeon R7 350
AMD Radeon HD 6770M
Radeon HD 6770M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
HD 7770 Radeon HD 7770
HD 6770M Radeon HD 6770M
vs
R9 M375 Radeon R9 M375
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
RX Vega 11 Radeon RX Vega 11
Pro Vega 56 AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
vs
Pro SSG Pro SSG
Pro WX 4170 Mobile AMD Radeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile
vs
ATI Graphics Pro Turbo Pro Turbo
Radeon 530X AMD Radeon 530X
vs
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
NX-SoC NVIDIA NX SoC
vs
Radeon 780M Radeon 780M
R7 350 AMD Radeon R7 350
vs
R8 M445DX R8 M445DX
R7 350 AMD Radeon R7 350
vs
GT 420M GT 420M
R7 350 AMD Radeon R7 350
vs
GTX 850A GTX 850A
R7 350 AMD Radeon R7 350
vs
ATI HD 5550 HD 5550
R7 350 AMD Radeon R7 350
vs
RX 550X RX 550X
R7 350 AMD Radeon R7 350
vs
Tegra X1 Tegra X1

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 495 votes

Rate Radeon R7 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 82 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 350 or Radeon HD 6770M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.