Radeon 890M vs R7 350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
HD 7730 HD 7750 HD 7770 HD 8730 OEM HD 8740 OEM HD 8760 OEM R7 250E R7 250X R7 350 R7 350 640SP R7 450 OEM R9 255 OEM
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
520 530 540X 610 610M 660M 680M 820M 840M 860M 880M 890M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 350 with Radeon 890M, including specs and performance data.

R7 350
2016
2 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
5.12

890M outperforms R7 350 by a whopping 281% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R7 350 R7 350
Radeon 890M Radeon 890M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking667312
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.15100.00
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)
GPU code nameCape VerdeStrix Point
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 July 2016 (9 years ago)15 July 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121024
Core clock speed800 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2900 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million34,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate25.60185.6
Floating-point processing power0.8192 TFLOPS5.939 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs3264
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L0 Cacheno data256 KB
L1 Cache128 KB256 KB
L2 Cache256 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1125 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth72 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10−12
−330%
43
+330%
1440p4−5
−350%
18
+350%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 117
+0%
117
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 91
+0%
91
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 57
+0%
57
+0%
Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 77
+0%
77
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 44
+0%
44
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 69
+0%
69
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 53
+0%
53
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 53
+0%
53
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 50
+0%
50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
+0%
33
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

This is how R7 350 and Radeon 890M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 890M is 330% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 890M is 350% faster in 1440p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 5.12 19.53
Recency 6 July 2016 15 July 2024
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 890M has a 281.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 266.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 890M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 350 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 350 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon 890M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon R7 350
Radeon R7 350
AMD Radeon 890M
Radeon 890M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
Radeon 550 Radeon 550
Radeon 890M Radeon 890M
vs
GTX 880M SLI GeForce GTX 880M SLI
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
HD 7770 Radeon HD 7770
R7 M365X Radeon R7 M365X
vs
RTX 3050 Max-Q GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q
P102-100 P102 100
vs
RX 7900 GRE Radeon RX 7900 GRE
P102-100 P102 100
vs
H200 NVL H200 NVL
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
HD 8350G Radeon HD 8350G
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
GT 720 OEM GeForce GT 720 OEM
RX 580 OEM Radeon RX 580 OEM
vs
GTX 460 SE v2 GeForce GTX 460 SE v2
RX 7700S RX 7700S
vs
RX 580 OEM RX 580 OEM
Quadro P3200 Quadro P3200
vs
Radeon 610M Radeon 610M
Tesla V100 DGXS Tesla V100 DGXS
vs
Playstation 5 Pro GPU Playstation 5 Pro GPU
Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
vs
Tesla T4 Tesla T4

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 555 votes

Rate Radeon R7 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 256 votes

Rate Radeon 890M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 350 or Radeon 890M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.