RTX A4000 vs Radeon R7 350

Place in the ranking	673	86
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	7.22	25.61
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)	Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code name	Cape Verde	GA104
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	6 July 2016 (9 years ago)	12 April 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	6144
Core clock speed	800 MHz	735 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1560 MHz
Number of transistors	1,500 million	17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	140 Watt
Texture fill rate	25.60	299.5
Floating-point processing power	0.8192 TFLOPS	19.17 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	96
TMUs	32	192
Tensor Cores	no data	192
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	48
L1 Cache	128 KB	6 MB
L2 Cache	256 KB	4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	168 mm	241 mm
Width	1-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1125 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	72 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	4x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	-	8.6
DLSS	-	+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	5.16	46.56
Recency	6 July 2016	12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	140 Watt

R7 350 has 155% lower power consumption.

RTX A4000, on the other hand, has a 802% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 350 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 350 is a desktop graphics card while RTX A4000 is a workstation one.