Quadro P3200 vs Radeon R7 350

Place in performance ranking	570	222
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.84	3.66
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Cape Verde	N18E-Q1
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	6 July 2016 (7 years ago)	27 February 2017 (7 years ago)
Current price	$142	$2122

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P3200 has 336% better value for money than R7 350.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	1792
Core clock speed	800 MHz	708 - 1202 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1228 MHz
Number of transistors	1,500 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	78 Watt
Texture fill rate	25.60	172.8
Floating-point performance	819.2 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R7 350 and Quadro P3200 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Length	168 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	4500 MHz	7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	72 GB/s	168.3 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	no data	6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	18−21 −361%	83 +361%
4K	6−7 −367%	28 +367%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

8−9
−363%

35−40

+363%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −364%	65 +364%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 −344%	40−45 +344%
Battlefield 5	18−20 −322%	75−80 +322%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −370%	45−50 +370%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −363%	35−40 +363%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −342%	50−55 +342%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −336%	60−65 +336%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −352%	95 +352%
Hitman 3	10−11 −360%	45−50 +360%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −333%	90−95 +333%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −322%	75−80 +322%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −343%	60−65 +343%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −333%	75−80 +333%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −319%	65−70 +319%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −367%	56 +367%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 −344%	40−45 +344%
Battlefield 5	18−20 −322%	75−80 +322%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −370%	45−50 +370%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −363%	35−40 +363%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −342%	50−55 +342%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −336%	60−65 +336%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −325%	100−110 +325%
Hitman 3	10−11 −360%	45−50 +360%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −333%	90−95 +333%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −322%	75−80 +322%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −343%	60−65 +343%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −333%	75−80 +333%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −367%	84 +367%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −319%	65−70 +319%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −344%	40 +344%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 −344%	40−45 +344%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −370%	45−50 +370%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −363%	35−40 +363%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −342%	50−55 +342%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −350%	72 +350%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −333%	90−95 +333%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −333%	75−80 +333%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −360%	46 +360%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −319%	65−70 +319%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−343%

60−65
+343%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 −340%	40−45 +340%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 −380%	45−50 +380%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −340%	21−24 +340%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −343%	30−35 +343%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −333%	35−40 +333%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −360%	45−50 +360%
Hitman 3	6−7 −350%	27−30 +350%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −370%	45−50 +370%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −340%	40−45 +340%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −317%	50−55 +317%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −367%	27−30 +367%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −325%	16−18 +325%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10
−322%

35−40

+322%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −360%	21−24 +360%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%
Hitman 3	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 −333%	24−27 +333%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	3−4 −433%	16−18 +433%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −367%	28 +367%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −500%	12−14 +500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −333%	12−14 +333%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −333%	12−14 +333%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −357%	30−35 +357%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 −333%	24−27 +333%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −340%	21−24 +340%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5
−400%

20−22

+400%

This is how R7 350 and Quadro P3200 compete in popular games:

Quadro P3200 is 361% faster in 1080p
Quadro P3200 is 367% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	5.58	23.09
Recency	6 July 2016	27 February 2017
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	78 Watt