HD Graphics P530 vs Radeon R7 350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
HD 7730 HD 7750 HD 7770 HD 8730 OEM HD 8740 OEM HD 8760 OEM R7 250E R7 250X R7 350 R7 350 640SP R7 450 OEM R9 255 OEM
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Apollo Lake GT1 5 P530 Iris Pro Graphics P555

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 350 and HD Graphics P530, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R7 350
2016
2 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
5.16
+101%
HD Graphics P530
2015
1740 MB DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4, 15 Watt
2.57

R7 350 outperforms HD Graphics P530 by a whopping 101% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R7 350 R7 350
HD Graphics P530 HD Graphics P530

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking673867
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.2213.19
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameCape VerdeSkylake GT2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date6 July 2016 (9 years ago)1 September 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512192
Core clock speed800 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1150 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate25.6018.40
Floating-point processing power0.8192 TFLOPS0.4416 TFLOPS
ROPs163
TMUs3216
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1740 MB
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1125 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth72 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.97

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 51 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 5.16 2.57
Recency 6 July 2016 1 September 2015
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1740 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 15 Watt

R7 350 has a 101% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, and a 18% higher maximum VRAM amount.

HD Graphics P530, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 267% lower power consumption.

The Radeon R7 350 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics P530 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
HD 7770 Radeon HD 7770
HD Graphics P530 HD Graphics P530
vs
R7 250 Radeon R7 250
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
ATI HD 5870 Radeon HD 5870
P102-100 P102 100
vs
Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB
P102-100 P102 100
vs
RTX A2000 12 GB RTX A2000 12 GB
P102-100 P102 100
vs
UHD Graphics 64EU Graphics 64EU
P102-100 P102 100
vs
RTX 4060 RTX 4060
P102-100 P102 100
vs
RTX A4000H RTX A4000H
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
HD 8280 HD 8280
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
Go 7900 GS Go 7900 GS
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
HD 7950 Mac Edition HD 7950 Mac Edition
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
GT 545 OEM GT 545 OEM
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
Sky 500 Sky 500

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 594 votes

Rate Radeon R7 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 28 votes

Rate HD Graphics P530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 350 or HD Graphics P530, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.