GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile vs Radeon R7 350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 350 with GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

R7 350
2016
2 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
5.11

RTX 5070 Mobile outperforms R7 350 by a whopping 855% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking64969
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.0874.41
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameCape VerdeGB206
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 July 2016 (9 years ago)April 2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5124608
Core clock speed800 MHz907 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1425 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million21,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate25.60205.2
Floating-point processing power0.8192 TFLOPS13.13 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs32144
Tensor Coresno data144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12−14
−925%
123
+925%
1440p7−8
−943%
73
+943%
4K3−4
−1133%
37
+1133%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
God of War 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 222
+0%
222
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
God of War 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 163
+0%
163
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
God of War 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 149
+0%
149
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
God of War 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 105
+0%
105
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 115
+0%
115
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 112
+0%
112
+0%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
God of War 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Valorant 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
God of War 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

This is how R7 350 and RTX 5070 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5070 Mobile is 925% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5070 Mobile is 943% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5070 Mobile is 1133% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 59 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.11 48.81
Recency 6 July 2016 on April 2025
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 50 Watt

RTX 5070 Mobile has a 855.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 10% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 350 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 350 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 350
Radeon R7 350
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 532 votes

Rate Radeon R7 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 68 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 350 or GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.