GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs Radeon R7 350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 350 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R7 350
2016
2 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
5.47

RTX 4070 Ti outperforms R7 350 by a whopping 1376% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6138
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data49.01
Power efficiency6.9919.89
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameCape VerdeAD104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date6 July 2016 (8 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5127680
Core clock speed800 MHz2310 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2610 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt285 Watt
Texture fill rate25.60626.4
Floating-point processing power0.8192 TFLOPS40.09 TFLOPS
ROPs1680
TMUs32240
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mm285 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount2 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s504.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14−16
−1507%
225
+1507%
1440p10−12
−1380%
148
+1380%
4K6−7
−1450%
93
+1450%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.55
1440pno data5.40
4Kno data8.59

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 316
+0%
316
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 236
+0%
236
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 253
+0%
253
+0%
Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 218
+0%
218
+0%
Far Cry 5 211
+0%
211
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 244
+0%
244
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 180
+0%
180
+0%
Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 185
+0%
185
+0%
Dota 2 259
+0%
259
+0%
Far Cry 5 203
+0%
203
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 228
+0%
228
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 178
+0%
178
+0%
Metro Exodus 197
+0%
197
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 453
+0%
453
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 167
+0%
167
+0%
Dota 2 243
+0%
243
+0%
Far Cry 5 189
+0%
189
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 222
+0%
222
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550
+0%
500−550
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 156
+0%
156
+0%
Metro Exodus 131
+0%
131
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 105
+0%
105
+0%
Far Cry 5 182
+0%
182
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 172
+0%
172
+0%
Metro Exodus 84
+0%
84
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 149
+0%
149
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 48
+0%
48
+0%
Dota 2 226
+0%
226
+0%
Far Cry 5 111
+0%
111
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how R7 350 and RTX 4070 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 Ti is 1507% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 Ti is 1380% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 Ti is 1450% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.47 80.71
Recency 6 July 2016 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 285 Watt

R7 350 has 418.2% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 Ti, on the other hand, has a 1375.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 350 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 350
Radeon R7 350
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 495 votes

Rate Radeon R7 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 7307 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 350 or GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.