GeForce GT 620 vs Radeon R7 350

Place in performance ranking	568	1072
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.96	0.01
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)	Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code name	Cape Verde	GF108
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	6 July 2016 (7 years ago)	15 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$39.99
Current price	$142	$125 (3.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

R7 350 has 9500% better value for money than GT 620.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	96
CUDA cores	no data	96
Core clock speed	800 MHz	700 MHz
Number of transistors	1,500 million	585 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	49 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	98 °C
Texture fill rate	25.60	11.2 billion/sec
Floating-point performance	819.2 gflops	268.8 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	no data	PCI Express 2.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	168 mm	5.7" (14.5 cm)
Height	no data	2.7" (6.9 cm)
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	4500 MHz	1.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	72 GB/s	14.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA
Multi monitor support	no data	+
HDMI	+	+
HDCP	no data	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	no data	Internal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.2
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	no data	+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	5.57	0.97
Recency	6 July 2016	15 May 2012
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	49 Watt