Radeon RX 6900 vs R7 340 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated37
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data19.07
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameOlandNavi 21
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date5 May 2015 (10 years ago)28 October 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3844608
Core clock speed730 MHzno data
Boost clock speed780 MHz2105 MHz
Number of transistors950 million23,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt255 Watt
Texture fill rate18.72606.2
Floating-point processing power0.599 TFLOPS19.4 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs24288
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 May 2015 28 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 255 Watt

R7 340 OEM has 410% lower power consumption.

RX 6900, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 340 OEM and Radeon RX 6900. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM
Radeon R7 340 OEM
AMD Radeon RX 6900
Radeon RX 6900

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 26 votes

Rate Radeon R7 340 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 88 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 340 OEM or Radeon RX 6900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.