Radeon RX 6500 vs R7 265

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 265 with Radeon RX 6500, including specs and performance data.

R7 265
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
10.37

RX 6500 outperforms R7 265 by an impressive 90% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking404265
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.72no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)no data
GPU code namePitcairnno data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date13 February 2014 (10 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data
Current price$242 (1.6x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024no data
Boost clock speed925 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)150 Wattno data
Texture fill rate59.20no data
Floating-point performance1,894 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R7 265 and Radeon RX 6500 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1400 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortno data
Eyefinity1no data
HDMI+no data
DisplayPort support-no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D-no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
ZeroCore-no data
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Mantle-no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−93.8%
30−35
+93.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−117%
35−40
+117%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−113%
30−35
+113%
Battlefield 5 30−33
−117%
65−70
+117%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−90.5%
40−45
+90.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−93.8%
30−35
+93.8%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−91.7%
45−50
+91.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−96.3%
50−55
+96.3%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−100%
90−95
+100%
Hitman 3 18−20
−117%
35−40
+117%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−95%
75−80
+95%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−100%
50−55
+100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
−113%
60−65
+113%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−96.7%
55−60
+96.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−117%
35−40
+117%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−113%
30−35
+113%
Battlefield 5 30−33
−117%
65−70
+117%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−90.5%
40−45
+90.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−93.8%
30−35
+93.8%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−91.7%
45−50
+91.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−96.3%
50−55
+96.3%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−100%
90−95
+100%
Hitman 3 18−20
−117%
35−40
+117%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−95%
75−80
+95%
Metro Exodus 30−33
−120%
65−70
+120%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−100%
50−55
+100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
−113%
60−65
+113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−105%
40−45
+105%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−96.7%
55−60
+96.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−117%
35−40
+117%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−113%
30−35
+113%
Battlefield 5 30−33
−117%
65−70
+117%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−93.8%
30−35
+93.8%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−91.7%
45−50
+91.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−96.3%
50−55
+96.3%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−100%
90−95
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−105%
40−45
+105%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−96.7%
55−60
+96.7%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−108%
24−27
+108%
Hitman 3 12−14
−91.7%
21−24
+91.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−90.5%
40−45
+90.5%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−106%
35−40
+106%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−106%
30−35
+106%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−90.5%
40−45
+90.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−100%
20−22
+100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−111%
35−40
+111%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−120%
10−12
+120%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−106%
30−35
+106%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−117%
35−40
+117%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−111%
35−40
+111%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−117%
12−14
+117%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−120%
10−12
+120%
Hitman 3 7−8
−114%
14−16
+114%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−120%
21−24
+120%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−111%
18−20
+111%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−113%
16−18
+113%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−117%
12−14
+117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−100%
20−22
+100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Battlefield 5 9−10
−111%
18−20
+111%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−120%
10−12
+120%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−114%
14−16
+114%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−92.9%
27−30
+92.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.37 19.73

The Radeon RX 6500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 265 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 265 is a desktop card while Radeon RX 6500 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 265
Radeon R7 265
AMD Radeon RX 6500
Radeon RX 6500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 368 votes

Rate Radeon R7 265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 35 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.