R7 360 vs R7 265

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

R7 265
10.33
+29.6%

R7 265 outperforms R7 360 by 30% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking401480
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money1.651.57
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code namePitcairnTobago
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferencereference
Release date13 February 2014 (10 years old)18 June 2015 (8 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 $109
Current price$242 (1.6x MSRP)$13.98 (0.1x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

R7 265 has 5% better value for money than R7 360.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024768
Boost clock speed925 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate59.2050.40
Floating-point performance1,894 gflops1,613 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0PCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length210 mm165 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin1 x 6-pin
Bridgeless CrossFireno data1

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s112 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Eyefinity11
Number of Eyefinity displaysno data6
HDMI++
DisplayPort support-+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration--
CrossFire11
Enduro--
FreeSync11
HD3D--
PowerTune-+
TrueAudio-+
ZeroCore--
VCEno data+
DDMA audio++

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 12
Shader Model5.16.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkanno data+
Mantle-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 265 10.33
+29.6%
R7 360 7.97

R7 265 outperforms R7 360 by 30% in our combined benchmark results.


3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R7 265 5220
+27%
R7 360 4110

R7 265 outperforms R7 360 by 27% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 10.33 7.97
Recency 13 February 2014 18 June 2015
Cost $149 $109
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 100 Watt

The Radeon R7 265 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 360 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 265
Radeon R7 265
AMD Radeon R7 360
Radeon R7 360

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 346 votes

Rate AMD Radeon R7 265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 555 votes

Rate AMD Radeon R7 360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.