HD Graphics 3000 vs Radeon R7 265
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon R7 265 with HD Graphics 3000, including specs and performance data.
R7 265 outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by a whopping 1490% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 441 | 1196 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 93 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 5.10 | no data |
Power efficiency | 4.79 | no data |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2011−2020) | Generation 6.0 (2011) |
GPU code name | Pitcairn | Sandy Bridge GT2+ |
Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
Design | reference | no data |
Release date | 13 February 2014 (10 years ago) | 1 February 2011 (14 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1024 | 96 |
Core clock speed | no data | 650 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Number of transistors | 2,800 million | 1,160 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | unknown |
Texture fill rate | 59.20 | 15.60 |
Floating-point processing power | 1.894 TFLOPS | 0.2496 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 32 | 2 |
TMUs | 64 | 12 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | Ring Bus |
Length | 210 mm | no data |
Width | 2-slot | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | System Shared |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | System Shared |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | System Shared |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | no data |
Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Portable Device Dependent |
Eyefinity | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
CrossFire | + | - |
FreeSync | + | - |
DDMA audio | + | no data |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 11.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | N/A |
Vulkan | - | N/A |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 140−150
+1456%
| 9
−1456%
|
Cost per frame, $
1080p | 1.06 | no data |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 3
+0%
|
3
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Fortnite | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
World of Tanks | 11
+0%
|
11
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 7
+0%
|
7
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
World of Tanks | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Valorant | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Dota 2 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Valorant | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
This is how R7 265 and HD Graphics 3000 compete in popular games:
- R7 265 is 1456% faster in 1080p
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 35 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 10.02 | 0.63 |
Recency | 13 February 2014 | 1 February 2011 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 32 nm |
R7 265 has a 1490.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon R7 265 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 3000 in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon R7 265 is a desktop card while HD Graphics 3000 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.