GeForce 410M vs Radeon R7 265

Place in the ranking	480	1229
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.47	no data
Power efficiency	4.90	4.09
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code name	Pitcairn	GF119
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Design	reference	no data
Release date	13 February 2014 (11 years ago)	5 January 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$149	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	48
Core clock speed	no data	575 MHz
Boost clock speed	925 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	2,800 million	292 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	12 Watt
Texture fill rate	59.20	4.600
Floating-point processing power	1.894 TFLOPS	0.1104 TFLOPS
Gigaflops	no data	73
ROPs	32	4
TMUs	64	8
L1 Cache	256 KB	64 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCIe 3.0	PCI-E 2.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	210 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1 x 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	Up to 512 MB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1400 MHz	Up to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidth	179.2 GB/s	12.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI
Multi monitor support	no data	+
Eyefinity	+	-
HDMI	+	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire	+	-
FreeSync	+	-
DDMA audio	+	no data
Power management	no data	8.0

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	+
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	-	N/A
CUDA	-	+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

110−120
+1275%

−1275%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

1.35

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Hogwarts Legacy	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Hogwarts Legacy	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Valorant	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Dota 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Far Cry 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Hogwarts Legacy	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Metro Exodus	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Valorant	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Dota 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Far Cry 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Hogwarts Legacy	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Valorant	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Hogwarts Legacy	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Valorant	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

2−3

+0%

2−3

+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

2−3

+0%

2−3

+0%

This is how R7 265 and GeForce 410M compete in popular games:

R7 265 is 1275% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 36 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.13	0.61
Recency	13 February 2014	5 January 2011
Chip lithography	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	12 Watt

R7 265 has a 1396.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 410M, on the other hand, has 1150% lower power consumption.

The Radeon R7 265 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 410M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 265 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 410M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Radeon R7 265

GeForce 410M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

NVIDIA RTX 5080 Mobile

350 OEM

AMD HD 6770 Green Edition

NVIDIA RTX 5060 Mobile

235X OEM

AMD Vega 11 Embedded

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 382 votes

Rate Radeon R7 265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

3 325 votes

Rate GeForce 410M on a scale of 1 to 5:

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 265 or GeForce 410M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.