GeForce 405M vs Radeon R7 260X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking574not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.16no data
Power efficiency5.13no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameBonaireGT218
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date8 October 2013 (12 years ago)5 January 2011 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$139 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores89616
Core clock speedno data606 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,080 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt14 Watt
Texture fill rate61.604.848
Floating-point processing power1.971 TFLOPS0.03878 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data73
ROPs164
TMUs568
L1 Cache224 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0PCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length170 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GBUp to 512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedno dataUp to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidth104 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortDisplayPort, HDMI, VGA, Dual Link DVI, Single Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
Eyefinity+-
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
DDMA audio+no data
Power managementno data8.0

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 API
Shader Model6.34.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 October 2013 5 January 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 14 Watt

R7 260X has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 405M, on the other hand, has 721% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 260X and GeForce 405M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 260X is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 405M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 460 votes

Rate Radeon R7 260X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 17 votes

Rate GeForce 405M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 260X or GeForce 405M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.