HD Graphics 4000 vs Radeon R7 260

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

R7 260
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 115 Watt
7.48
+539%

Radeon R7 260 outperforms HD Graphics 4000 by a whopping 539% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking5001030
Place by popularitynot in top-10035
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.030.13
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Gen. 7 Ivy Bridge (2011−2012)
GPU code nameBonaireIvy Bridge
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date17 December 2013 (10 years ago)23 March 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109 no data
Current price$205 (1.9x MSRP)$91

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

R7 260 has 692% better value for money than HD Graphics 4000.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76816
Core clock speedno data350 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million1,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Wattunknown
Texture fill rate48.0020.80
Floating-point performance1,536 gflops33.6 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R7 260 and HD Graphics 4000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length170 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed1625 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth104 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity1no data
HDMI+no data
DisplayPort support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D-no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
ZeroCore-no data
DDMA audio+no data
Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1211.1 (11_0)
Shader Model6.35.0
OpenGL4.64.0
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkanno data1.1.80
Mantle-no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 260 7.48
+539%
HD Graphics 4000 1.17

Radeon R7 260 outperforms HD Graphics 4000 by 539% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R7 260 2891
+537%
HD Graphics 4000 454

Radeon R7 260 outperforms HD Graphics 4000 by 537% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R7 260 4380
+813%
HD Graphics 4000 480

Radeon R7 260 outperforms HD Graphics 4000 by 813% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p75−80
+525%
12
−525%
Full HD60−65
+500%
10
−500%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.48 1.17
Recency 17 December 2013 23 March 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm

The Radeon R7 260 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 260 is a desktop card while HD Graphics 4000 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 260
Radeon R7 260
Intel HD Graphics 4000
HD Graphics 4000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 49 votes

Rate Radeon R7 260 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 4841 vote

Rate HD Graphics 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.