Radeon 740M vs R7 250X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 250X with Radeon 740M, including specs and performance data.

R7 250X
2014
2 GB GDDR5, 80 Watt
5.87

Radeon 740M outperforms R7 250X by an impressive 53% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking559451
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.62no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)RDNA 3
GPU code nameCape VerdePhoenix
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date13 February 2014 (10 years ago)23 May 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99 no data
Current price$207 (2.1x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640256
Core clock speedno data1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz2500 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt30 Watt (30 - 15 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate38.0040.00
Floating-point performance1,216 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R7 250X and Radeon 740M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1625 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth96 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
Eyefinity1no data
HDMI+no data
DisplayPort support-no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D-no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
ZeroCore-no data
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkanno data1.3
Mantle-no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 250X 5.87
Radeon 740M 9.00
+53.3%

740M outperforms R7 250X by 53% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R7 250X 2268
Radeon 740M 3475
+53.2%

740M outperforms R7 250X by 53% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−58.3%
18−20
+58.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−62.5%
12−14
+62.5%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−55.6%
27−30
+55.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−56.3%
24−27
+56.3%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−63%
40−45
+63%
Hitman 3 10−11
−70%
16−18
+70%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−62.5%
35−40
+62.5%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−56.3%
24−27
+56.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−55.6%
27−30
+55.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−57.1%
30−35
+57.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−58.3%
18−20
+58.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−62.5%
12−14
+62.5%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−55.6%
27−30
+55.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−56.3%
24−27
+56.3%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−63%
40−45
+63%
Hitman 3 10−11
−70%
16−18
+70%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−62.5%
35−40
+62.5%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−56.3%
24−27
+56.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−55.6%
27−30
+55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−58.3%
18−20
+58.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−57.1%
30−35
+57.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−58.3%
18−20
+58.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−62.5%
12−14
+62.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−63%
40−45
+63%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−62.5%
35−40
+62.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−55.6%
27−30
+55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−58.3%
18−20
+58.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−57.1%
30−35
+57.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−56.3%
24−27
+56.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Hitman 3 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−58.3%
18−20
+58.3%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−66.7%
14−16
+66.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Hitman 3 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 1−2
Far Cry 5 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.87 9.00
Recency 13 February 2014 23 May 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 30 Watt

The Radeon 740M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 250X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 250X is a desktop card while Radeon 740M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 250X
Radeon R7 250X
AMD Radeon 740M
Radeon 740M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 158 votes

Rate Radeon R7 250X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 34 votes

Rate Radeon 740M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.