Radeon RX 7700S vs R7 250E

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 250E with Radeon RX 7700S, including specs and performance data.

R7 250E
2013
1 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
4.32

RX 7700S outperforms R7 250E by a whopping 810% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking679110
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.26no data
Power efficiency5.4827.42
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameCape VerdeNavi 33
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date20 December 2013 (11 years ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5122048
Core clock speed800 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2500 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate25.60320.0
Floating-point processing power0.8192 TFLOPS20.48 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs32128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 250E 4.32
RX 7700S 39.32
+810%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R7 250E 1970
RX 7700S 24246
+1131%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12−14
−900%
120
+900%
1440p6−7
−950%
63
+950%
4K5−6
−840%
47
+840%

Cost per frame, $

1080p9.08no data
1440p18.17no data
4K21.80no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 88
+0%
88
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 81
+0%
81
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 202
+0%
202
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Metro Exodus 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 68
+0%
68
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Dota 2 89
+0%
89
+0%
Far Cry 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 167
+0%
167
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 133
+0%
133
+0%
Metro Exodus 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 61
+0%
61
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Dota 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 144
+0%
144
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 67
+0%
67
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 67
+0%
67
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
World of Tanks 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 92
+0%
92
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Dota 2 68
+0%
68
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 68
+0%
68
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68
+0%
68
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8
+0%
8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Dota 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 48
+0%
48
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

This is how R7 250E and RX 7700S compete in popular games:

  • RX 7700S is 900% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7700S is 950% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7700S is 840% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.32 39.32
Recency 20 December 2013 4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 100 Watt

R7 250E has 81.8% lower power consumption.

RX 7700S, on the other hand, has a 810.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7700S is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 250E in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 250E is a desktop card while Radeon RX 7700S is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 250E
Radeon R7 250E
AMD Radeon RX 7700S
Radeon RX 7700S

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 23 votes

Rate Radeon R7 250E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 117 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7700S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.