H200 NVL vs Radeon R7 250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking867not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.10no data
Power efficiency2.98no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Hopper (2022−2024)
GPU code nameOlandGH100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date8 October 2013 (12 years ago)18 November 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$89 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38416896
Core clock speedno data1365 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz1785 MHz
Number of transistors950 million80,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate25.20942.5
Floating-point processing power0.8064 TFLOPS60.32 TFLOPS
ROPs824
TMUs24528
Tensor Coresno data528
L1 Cache96 KB33 MB
L2 Cache256 KB50 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Length168 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsN/A8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM3e
Maximum RAM amount2 GB141 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit6144 Bit
Memory clock speed1150 MHz1593 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s4.89 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 12N/A
Shader Model5.1N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-9.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 October 2013 18 November 2024
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 141 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 600 Watt

R7 250 has 700% lower power consumption.

H200 NVL, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 6950% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 250 and H200 NVL. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 250 is a desktop graphics card while H200 NVL is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 250
Radeon R7 250
NVIDIA H200 NVL
H200 NVL

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 504 votes

Rate Radeon R7 250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 21 votes

Rate H200 NVL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 250 or H200 NVL, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.