FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs Radeon R7 250

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking800not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.10no data
Power efficiency2.95no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameOlandTahiti
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date8 October 2013 (11 years ago)1 March 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$89 $3,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841792
Core clock speedno data825 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz950 MHz
Number of transistors950 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt375 Watt
Texture fill rate25.20106.4
Floating-point processing power0.8064 TFLOPS3.405 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs24112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length168 mm305 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsN/A2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1150 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s240.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA1x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan-1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 October 2013 1 March 2014
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 375 Watt

R7 250 has 400% lower power consumption.

S10000 Passive 12GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 250 and FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 250 is a desktop card while FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 250
Radeon R7 250
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB
FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 436 votes

Rate Radeon R7 250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 21 vote

Rate FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.