Radeon Instinct MI300 vs R7 240

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking912not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.16no data
Power efficiency5.53no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)CDNA 3.0 (2023−2024)
GPU code nameOlandAqua Vanjaram
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date8 October 2013 (12 years ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$69 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32014080
Core clock speedno data1000 MHz
Boost clock speed780 MHz1700 MHz
Number of transistors950 million153,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate14.001,496
Floating-point processing power0.448 TFLOPS47.87 TFLOPS
ROPs8no data
TMUs20880
Tensor Coresno data880
L1 Cache80 KB3.4 MB
L2 Cache256 KB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Length168 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsN/A2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB128 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed1150 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s3,277 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 12N/A
Shader Model5.1N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan-N/A
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 October 2013 4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 128 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 600 Watt

R7 240 has 1100% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 240 and Radeon Instinct MI300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 240 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Instinct MI300 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 240
Radeon R7 240
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300
Radeon Instinct MI300

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 1358 votes

Rate Radeon R7 240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 27 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 240 or Radeon Instinct MI300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.