Radeon Instinct MI300 vs R5 430 OEM

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking809not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.67no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)CDNA 3.0 (2023−2024)
GPU code nameOlandAqua Vanjaram
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date30 June 2016 (8 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38414080
Core clock speed730 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed780 MHz1700 MHz
Number of transistors950 million153,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate18.721,496
Floating-point processing power0.599 TFLOPS47.87 TFLOPS
ROPs8no data
TMUs24880
Tensor Coresno data880

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB128 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed1150 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth36.8 GB/s3,277 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)N/A
Shader Model5.1N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 June 2016 4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 128 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 600 Watt

R5 430 OEM has 1100% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 430 OEM and Radeon Instinct MI300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 430 OEM is a desktop card while Radeon Instinct MI300 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
Radeon R5 430 OEM
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300
Radeon Instinct MI300

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 369 votes

Rate Radeon R5 430 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 25 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.