GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs Radeon R7 240

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
HD 8570 OEM HD 8670 OEM R5 240 OEM R5 340 OEM R5 340X OEM R5 430 OEM R7 240 R7 250 R7 340 OEM R7 350 OEM R7 350X OEM R7 430 OEM
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
4050 Max-Q 4050 Mobile 4060 Max-Q 4060 Mobile 4060 Ti Mobile 4070 Max-Q 4070 Mobile 4080 Max-Q 4080 Mobile 4080 Ti Max-Q 4080 Ti Mobile 4090 Max-Q 4090 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 240 with GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

R7 240
2013, $69
2 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
2.16

RTX 4090 Mobile outperforms R7 240 by a whopping 2903% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R7 240 R7 240
RTX 4090 Mobile RTX 4090 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking91931
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.16no data
Power efficiency5.5441.62
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameOlandAD103
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date8 October 2013 (12 years ago)3 January 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$69 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3209728
Core clock speedno data1335 MHz
Boost clock speed780 MHz1695 MHz
Number of transistors950 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate14.00515.3
Floating-point processing power0.448 TFLOPS32.98 TFLOPS
ROPs8112
TMUs20304
Tensor Coresno data304
Ray Tracing Coresno data76
L1 Cache80 KB9.5 MB
L2 Cache256 KB64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsN/Ano data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1150 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGAPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R7 240 2.16
RTX 4090 Mobile 64.86
+2903%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 240 900
Samples: 3843
RTX 4090 Mobile 27072
+2908%
Samples: 2915

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R7 240 1220
RTX 4090 Mobile 46191
+3686%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD5−6
−3280%
169
+3280%
1440p4−5
−3125%
129
+3125%
4K2−3
−3800%
78
+3800%

Cost per frame, $

1080p13.80no data
1440p17.25no data
4K34.50no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 147
+0%
147
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 218
+0%
218
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 240
+0%
240
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 142
+0%
142
+0%
Far Cry 5 173
+0%
173
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 181
+0%
181
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 214
+0%
214
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 133
+0%
133
+0%
Dota 2 199
+0%
199
+0%
Far Cry 5 167
+0%
167
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 174
+0%
174
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 162
+0%
162
+0%
Metro Exodus 156
+0%
156
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 394
+0%
394
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 128
+0%
128
+0%
Dota 2 187
+0%
187
+0%
Far Cry 5 158
+0%
158
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 204
+0%
204
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 173
+0%
173
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 516
+0%
516
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 138
+0%
138
+0%
Metro Exodus 117
+0%
117
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 485
+0%
485
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 95
+0%
95
+0%
Far Cry 5 151
+0%
151
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 164
+0%
164
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 88
+0%
88
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 314
+0%
314
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 172
+0%
172
+0%
Metro Exodus 82
+0%
82
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150
+0%
150
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 48
+0%
48
+0%
Dota 2 179
+0%
179
+0%
Far Cry 5 107
+0%
107
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how R7 240 and RTX 4090 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4090 Mobile is 3280% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4090 Mobile is 3125% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4090 Mobile is 3800% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.16 64.86
Recency 8 October 2013 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 120 Watt

R7 240 has 140% lower power consumption.

RTX 4090 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 2903% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 240 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 240 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R7 240 Radeon R7 240
vs
ATI HD 4770 Radeon HD 4770
RTX 4090 Mobile GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
vs
RTX 5080 Mobile GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile
R7 240 Radeon R7 240
vs
ATI HD 4830 Radeon HD 4830
R7 240 R7 240
vs
RTX 3000 Max-Q RTX 3000 Max-Q
R7 240 R7 240
vs
Quadro T1000 T1000
R7 240 R7 240
vs
ATI Xpress 1200 Mobile IGP Xpress 1200 Mobile IGP
R7 240 R7 240
vs
Parhelia HR256
R7 240 R7 240
vs
RTX A5000 Mobile RTX A5000 Mobile
R7 240 R7 240
vs
RTX 4070 Max-Q RTX 4070 Max-Q
R7 240 R7 240
vs
HD 6970M X2 HD 6970M X2
HD 8550 OEM HD 8550 OEM
vs
GTX 675MX Mac Edition GTX 675MX Mac Edition
HD 8550 OEM HD 8550 OEM
vs
RX 580 XTR RX 580 XTR
HD 8550 OEM HD 8550 OEM
vs
FirePro S9150 S9150

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 1386 votes

Rate Radeon R7 240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 907 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 240 or GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.